Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (204441)	9/30/2004 10:24:47 AM
From: Elroy	Respond to of 1572446

It is clear from your posts that you are totally confused about our presence in Iraq. For you, everything DIDN'T change on 9/11. There is no danger of further attacks. We don't need to respond to 9/11. If Iraq was, as you claim, a response to 9/11, why didn't George invade Saudi Arabia (the source of fundamental Islamic terrorist philospohy and funds), remove their regime, and build a democratic, freedom loving Saudi society? That makes a lot more sense as a response to 9/11 (15 Saudis among 19 hijackers) than to invade secular Iraq. It's clear from your post that you have fallen for GOP rhetoric. There is virtually zero evidence connecting 9/11 and Iraq. Elroy