Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : John Kerry for President? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Chiu who wrote (1716)	9/30/2004 11:43:36 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3515

Your comments for item 3 is not logical. Th fact that the US support Israel and Muslims may hate America does not mean the two are linked. It's people like Soros and yourself that try to link them and cause issues among the groups involved. As always, words are mightier than swords. Let me see if I can clarify this: How about "The friend of my enemy is an enemy."? Let me show you a slight variation of such thinking: Message 20341172 In the 1973 Yom Kippur War between Israel and the Arabs, the Arabs had Israel on the ropes- -almost defeated. Israel was running out of supplies was the problem. President Nixon then announced and ordered an emergency American resupply of Israel with war materiel. Israel went on to win the war. Do you think the Arabs are so utterly stupid they didn't notice? I've been in that part of the world and met many Arabs there. Let me tell something: They're not. Not hardly. (item 4) Yes, Soros has the right to believe in whatever he wants. But he has no rights to destroy nations financially just because the religion practiced there does not agree with his own. This is what you said: 4) Do you know that Soros is an atheist and has made every effort to realize his vision of a world without God? I then pointed out that what Soros is doing is NO DIFFERENT than what many other wealthy men of many other religious beliefs have before and will do after him and us: using his wealth to promote his religious beliefs. Why should he not be allowed to but they are? But actually, where is your evidence he is doing any such thing as you claim? And you never did back up assertion (5).