SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (12559)9/30/2004 3:21:11 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Citygroup owns a mere 45 million shares of MRK.

Mish



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (12559)9/30/2004 4:14:30 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Daily Reckoning - Something odd is happening

"Something very odd appears to be happening on Wall Street
this month," writes James Ferguson in tomorrow's MoneyWeek magazine.

Yes, dear reader, many financial services claim to be able
to provide you with tomorrow's headlines today, but only we
here at The Daily Reckoning can do so. (We peeked at James'
article before it went to press!)

What is odd, says James, is the U.S. bond market. Everyone
knew bonds peaked out last summer. And everyone knew yields
would rise from here to eternity. But recently, that is,
maybe until yesterday, bond yields went down and bond
prices went up - the very opposite of what they were
supposed to do.

What could it mean?

Well, it could be nothing more than "a giant fake-out," as Christopher Wood puts it, caused entirely by Asian and Chinese buying.

Then again, as tomorrow's headline suggests, it could be a
sign that "something evil this way comes."

"The jobless recovery is still largely jobless," James
points out.

"If the economy can't generate enough jobs, consumption
will falter and the recovery will stall."

"This is the first time since 1939," adds Christopher Wood,
"that employment has still not yet fully recovered 41
months after the previous business cycle peaked."

Yesterday, the government came out with a new figure for
GDP growth in the second quarter of this year - 3.3%, a
half of a percentage point greater than estimated.

Don't get too excited. The number is half fraud and half humbug. The fraud part jiggles the figures. The humbug part
misunderstands them.

Bill Gross addresses the fraud: "I am not a believer in
central bank intervention as a market mover past a short period... yes, they can move the markets in the short run, but eventually, if the market participants want to keep pushing, the central bank will lose."

How the bills get settled is the story behind the
headlines, not just for tomorrow, but for many years ahead.
James is nice enough to give us credit for worrying about a
"soft depression" a la Japan. "If the United States follows
[Japan's example]," he concludes, "there could be a very
nasty decade ahead."



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (12559)9/30/2004 4:17:06 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
Crude Bubble?
From the Daily Reckoning

- "There's a bubble in crude oil!" wails a chorus of Wall Street analysts...

- "A sudden and violent crash in crude oil prices cannot be
dismissed," warns Thorsten Fischer, senior economist for Economy.com. Meanwhile, Bear Stearns analyst Frederick Leuffer staunchly maintains his forecast that oil prices will average about $25 a barrel in 2005.

- Yesterday's oil inventory report - and subsequent
sell-off in crude oil - lent some temporary support to the bears' argument. Crude supplies jumped 3.4 million barrels in the week ended Sept. 24, according to the Energy Department. The surprising increase in stockpiles triggered
the very first drop in crude oil prices in 10 days.

- Investors took flight from almost every corner of the
energy markets. Crude for November delivery slumped 39
cents, to $49.51, while gasoline and heating oil both
dipped a bit. Oil shares also suffered the blunt trauma of rapid-fire sell orders, as the XOI Index of oil stocks retreated 1% from its all-time high, reached Tuesday.

- Once again, investors face the daunting question: Is the
oil bull market over or just beginning?

- We freely admit that one man's bull market is another
man's bubble, but any commodity market that features constrained supply and robust demand would seem more bull than bubble. Despite the vociferous objections of oil bears
like Fischer and Leuffer, oil keeps chugging higher.

- Maybe it's true that a bubble is developing in the oil market, just as Fischer and Leuffer imply. But we submit that the bubble in denial is far more advanced... and dangerous.

- "Denial," broadly defined, is the psychological tendency,
either conscious or unconscious, to repudiate all or a
portion of the total available meaning of a phenomenon in
order to allay anxiety and to minimize distress.

- "Denial, like an umbrella, includes many defenses, such
as distortion, forgetfulness, rationalization, humor, suppression and so on," explains Dr. Simon Wein of the Department of Psychiatry at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, "Implied in this definition is the belief that
denial is not always bad or maladaptive."

- Unfortunately, denial applied to financial markets is
almost always "bad and maladaptive" - also known as
"costly." Wall Street's obstinate, yet errant, forecasts
for falling oil prices are but one of many examples of the massive bubble in denial billowing before our eyes.

- Denial is pandemic. Consider the evidence... the lumpeninvestoriat holds the following "truths" to be
self-evident:

- Oil is overpriced, U.S. stocks are underpriced, real
estate always appreciates and a falling dollar is good for
the economy. Unfortunately, the lumps believed oil to be overpriced somewhere around $25 a barrel and believed stocks to be underpriced with the Nasdaq at 5,000. (So far,
their abiding faith in appreciating real estate and depreciating currency is serving them well.)

- The energy markets have been hosting widespread denial
for some time. One recently glimpsed chart tells the tale
of strikingly divergent price trends between the price of
crude oil and the price of oil stocks, as represented by
the XOI Index.

- On New Year's Eve 2001, crude oil changed hands for less
than $20 a barrel. One year later, the oil price fetched
more then $30 a barrel. Mysteriously, the XOI Index of
leading oil exploration and production companies FELL 10% during that time frame. Just two months later, the oil price kissed $40 a barrel, and the XOI Index was still languishing more than 15% BELOW its year-end 2001 level. Even today, as the price of crude oil flirts with $50 a barrel - or about 150% above the $20 price as of New Year's
2001 - the XOI Index has advanced less than 40%.

- Evidently, more than a few investors doubt the durability
of the crude oil bull market... even though it has endured
for nearly three years.

- Typically, during a lengthy bull run, resource stocks
will perform far better than the underlying commodities
they represent. For example, when the gold price jumped 50%
between year-end 2001 and year-end 2003, the XAU Index of
gold stocks doubled, while the HUI Index of "unhedged" gold
stocks more than tripled.

- No such confidence is evident among oil stock
investors... they're all about denial.

- Underpinning their evident skepticism evidenced is the
idea that a "fear premium" is causing oil to sell about
$15-20 above what simple supply and demand would dictate.
This notion is as seductive as it is misguided. Because the
threat of supply disruption is real and omnipresent, the
crude oil market deserves a "permanent premium."

- "In a perfect world," says oil analyst Bruce Lanni of
A.G. Edwards & Sons, "you'd take the premium out, and
you're looking at an oil price in the lower- to mid-30s.
But it is not a perfect world."

- There's a fact no one can deny.



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (12559)9/30/2004 4:22:33 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 116555
 
We think They sweat
Bill Bonner, back in London...

*** "We think, they sweat," writes colleague Steve
Sjuggerud. Steve doesn't believe that we are "just nasty gluttonous Americans." Instead, he seems to believe that we
earn our way in life, despite the evidence of the trade deficit, by thinking!

We will gladly take the other side of this trade! We've
seen thousands and thousands of Americans... over many,
many years... but rarely have we seen one actually
THINKING!
Americans are people who prefer action. That's why George
W. Bush is president; he doesn't even pretend to think.
It's why people buy stocks for many times what they are worth... why they believe that they can spend money their grandchildren haven't even earned yet... and why, following
a curious attack by mostly Saudi nationals based in
Pakistan or Afghanistan, Americans went to war with Iraq!

We have great respect for Steve's investment savvy... but
no one can be right about everything. As far as we can
tell, Steve thinks the trade deficit has no information content; it is mute. Apparently, it tells him nothing. But to us here at The Daily Reckoning, the trade deficit speaks
louder than actions. It tells us that America is spending
more than it earns... and that every day that this
continues, America grows poorer.

"Andy Kessler offers a more optimistic take on this conventional wisdom in his latest book, Running Money, Steve writes. "Quite frankly, I've never bought the conventional argument about trade deficits being a bad thing. So Andy Kessler's idea is a breath of fresh air."

What is Kessler's breezy insight?

"A problem is not a problem until it's a problem," Steve
tells us.

Hmmm...

A man jumps off a high building. He has no problem,
according to Kessler, as he passes the 25th floor. Still no
problem going by the 14th... or the 10th... the 7th... and
so on. He still has no problem as he goes by the
windowsills of the first floor... or even just before he reaches the dust on the pavement. In fact, up until that nanosecond in which his flesh is compressed against the concrete and his hard head is flattened... he is just fine!

"It's not the fall... that hurts at all... it's that sudden
stop," sings Percy Sledge in "Sudden Stop."

This is thinking? This is the thinking that earns America's
keep?

"We are not a bunch of gluttonous consumers who are
mortgaging away our future by overindulging and running
huge deficits in foreign goods," writes Kessler. "Instead,
the United States turns out high-margin intellectual
property that the rest of the world uses to build finished products. We may run trade deficits, but we have more margin than they do."

What?

Ooh la la... let's say you sell a hit song. High margin,
right? So you sell $1,000,000 worth to foreigners and you
bring back $500,000 in profit.

Great.

The foreigners are not nearly so smart. They don't think.
They sweat... and turn out a million gizmos... which they
sell for $10 each and make only $1 each. Low margin, right?

Who's better off? The foreigners, of course!
The trade deficit tells us that more money is going out
than coming in. The low margin products provide jobs,
profits, new factories, infrastructure and everything else
that raises standards of living. Margins may be higher in
the United States, but so what? The foreigners are selling
more and making more than we are. And they are taking the surplus and buying up U.S. assets.

Is this good?

Is Kessler really thinking... is he offering fresh air or
hot air?