SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Proof that John Kerry is Unfit for Command -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (13865)9/30/2004 2:00:14 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27181
 
Bush IGNORED TERRORISM. Quit trying to blame it on Clinton. At least Clinton did SOMETHING and stopped a few major attacks. Bush did nothing. Bush didn't even mention terrorism. Bush dismantled our counter-terror teams. Bush let 9-11 happen on his watch after he was warned on 8-6. Quit trying to cover up Bush's failures with lies.



To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (13865)9/30/2004 2:16:30 PM
From: cirrus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27181
 
You evade my question while repeating the same nonsense.

Clinton signed executive orders authorizing the CIA to kill Osama. Special Ops teams were on standby waiting to get him if he was located. Clinton ordered missle atacks on Osama's training camps even as the Republicans were accusing him of launching the attacks to shift attention from the trumped up impeachment trial.

Exactly what more could Clinton have done? Nuke Afghanistan?

...the Bush Adm barely had time to become familiar with the details of global geopolitical activites in that short period of time

Rumsfeld, Powell, Rice, Cheney, Tenet, Clarke... that crew had a hundred years experience between them. They knew all the players. Clarke and Tenet were holdovers from the Clinton administration. That they "barely had time to become familiar with geopolitical activities" is the most absurd post I've seen from you.

Oh.. and Ashcroft... a career CIA officer testified under oath to the 911 commission that Ashcroft didn't want to hear about al Queda. Ashcroft denied it, of course, but who do you believe... a career CIA man or a political hack who covers up statues because he's uncomfortable with a breast?

The whacko is uncomfortable with a bare breast, but he's in charge of the Justice Department and FBI domestic counter-terrorism anti-terrorism activities? Makes me feel very secure.