Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JBTFD who wrote (18140)	10/1/2004 2:02:28 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

Based on your reply, I assume it's safe to say you lied or were ignorant of the facts when you asserted..... "At the time the war resolution was passed it was nebulous as to what would happen to enforce the resolution. Like the sneaky politicians they are, the neocons inserted laguage that could be construed as an authorization to go to war. Bush and the neocons rammed the war down the rest of the UN memebers' throats."..... So now that the facts proved your assertions to be utterly baseless, you change the parameters of the debate yet again. You said, "So I guess that explains why there was no second UN rsolution. That and the fact that it was not possible to get one passed." Apparently you are seriously reality & fact challenged. I'm starting to think it's intentional. You can't honestly hold such firm opinions, yet be so completely ignorant of reality without an agenda or a cult like adherence to a political ideology IMO. The French said they would veto any new Resolution. Russia & Germany expressed serious concerns about a new Resolution authorizing force. The question is WHY? The answer is their corruption & duplicity because they took bribes from Saddam & illegally sold weapons to him at HUGE profits in violation of UN Resolutions they voted for. They had billions worth of extremely lucrative contracts granted by Saddam with the implicit understanding they would support Saddam against the UN & the US. Don't forget the billion in debts owed to them by Saddam..... Feel free to ignore those real facts........ HOW TO BUY A FRENCH VETO dev.siliconinvestor.com The French Connection dev.siliconinvestor.com Paris and Moscow, for their part, were bitterly opposed to the sanctions and had no interest in pushing investigations that could reveal deep involvement by their companies in the crooked deals. dev.siliconinvestor.com Had the administration merely "followed the money", it would have found Saddam Hussein's courage proportionate to the oil money he was skimming off Oil-for-Food. Matching that were the motivation for French, Chinese and Russian recalcitrance on enforcing UN resolutions concerning Iraq. dev.siliconinvestor.com More on France selling ILLEGAL WEAPONS to Iraq....... dev.siliconinvestor.com French connection armed Saddam dev.siliconinvestor.com Where Iraq Purchased Weapons 1973-2002 dev.siliconinvestor.com Allegations of Widespread Corruption Involve SADDAM Hussein, U.N. Senior Officials dev.siliconinvestor.com Oil-for-Food Winners -- Russians and Saudis dev.siliconinvestor.com

To: JBTFD who wrote (18140)	10/1/2004 2:34:41 PM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

You guys talk about lying. Where are the nuclear weapons? Where are all of the biological and chemical weapons? You guys have heard the response 1,000 times, but refuse to acknowledge it. US, UK, French, Soviet, and all the other principal intelligence agencies ALL said they were there, and they probably were wrong. That's not lying. What about that don't you hatemongering morons understand? If you don't comprehend the difference between a lie and an error, ask any 8-year old kid and he/she will tell you.