Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (204643)	10/2/2004 2:55:21 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572893

Army Says Reservists Failed to Report on Time By ROBERT BURNS, AP WASHINGTON (Oct. 1) - The Army is getting a grudging response - or none at all - from hundreds of former soldiers it ordered back into uniform for duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, although none has been declared AWOL. Army officials said Friday that 622 people, about one-third of the 1,765 Individual Ready Reserve members who were supposed to report for duty by Sept. 28, failed to show up. Some requested more time. Others wanted to be excused entirely. Some have not responded at all. The no-show rate is approximately what the Army anticipated when it announced the call-up last June, and officials said Friday they believe some no-shows eventually will turn up. That the Army has had to reach this deeply into its store of reserve soldiers is a measure of the strain the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns have put on the active-duty Army. When the U.S. invading force toppled Baghdad in April 2003, the Army thought it would be sending most of its soldiers home within months. Instead, it has kept 100,000 or more there ever since. Brig. Gen. Sean J. Byrne of the Army's personnel office in the Pentagon told reporters the Army was "pretty much on track" to getting the 4,402 IRR soldiers it expects to need to fill positions in active-duty and National Guard and Reserve units between now and next spring. However, another official, Robert H. Smiley, told the same news conference it was too early to rule out the possibility of expanding the IRR call-up to reach the 4,402 target. "We're going to have to track this on an almost daily basis," Smiley said. Smiley also said a separate call-up of several thousand more is likely next summer or fall because there will be more slots to fill in the force that rotates into Iraq and Afghanistan in 2006. Members of the Individual Ready Reserve are rarely called to active duty. The last time was 1990, when nearly 20,000 were mobilized. IRR members are people who were honorably discharged after finishing their active-duty tours, usually four to six years, but remained in the IRR for the rest of the eight-year commitment they made when they joined the Army. They are separate from the reserve troops who are more routinely mobilized - the National Guard and Reserve. The Army anticipated, based on past experience, that about one-third of the IRR people it called up would be disqualified for medical or other reasons. The trend so far bears that out. Thus the Army is calculating it will take 5,765 call-ups to get the 4,402 it needs. A separate problem is those who simply refuse to report. Byrne said he did not know how many have refused, but he disavowed recent statements of other Army officials that at least six no-shows have been listed as Absent Without Leave, or AWOL. He would not say how much leeway the Army will give no-shows before they are declared AWOL and subject to prosecution. "We're trying to deal with every individual case to make sure that we're giving everyone appropriate time to rectify whatever situation they may have," Byrne said. "No one is considered AWOL at this point." A total of 3,899 IRR soldiers have been contacted since July and given a report date as late as March 2005. Of that total, 1,498 have asked for a delay or an exemption based on a wide range of issues including medical, financial and personal problems, officials said. The Army has approved about 350 of those requests and rejected 26, said Raymond Robinson, chief of staff for the Army's top uniformed personnel officer. He said the 26 have been told to report for duty, and it was not clear what would happen if they did not. Of the approximately 350 approvals, 239 were for outright exemptions, meaning they will not have to come on active duty, Robinson said. As an example, Smiley cited a person who is already in Iraq as a Defense Department civilian employee. Others have been exempted for personal financial hardships and for medical reasons.

To: steve harris who wrote (204643)	10/2/2004 2:59:25 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572893

DeLay's troubles could deepen Ethics scandals may diminish Texas Republican's clout Charles Babington, Washington Post Saturday, October 2, 2004 Washington -- With House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, now involved directly or tangentially in a handful of ethics cases and investigations, some analysts say another setback could substantially weaken the lawmaker's ability to champion Republican causes and candidates. DeLay's bare-knuckle tactics have sparked controversy and Democratic ire for years, but Thursday's 62-page House ethics committee report highlighted DeLay's questionable arm-twisting of GOP members when crucial votes are at stake. The panel admonished him for offering a political favor in exchange for Rep. Nick Smith's support of a major Medicare prescription drug bill late last year. The report's conclusion marked the second time in five years that the ethics committee has chastised DeLay. A third setback, which conceivably could come from a pending complaint, would fuel critics' claims that DeLay has crossed an ethical threshold, several analysts said Friday. House Republicans still support their majority leader, party members said. But they are warily eyeing the pending complaint, along with a Texas grand jury's recent indictment of three of DeLay's political associates on fund- raising charges. DeLay, an energetic partisan admired by many colleagues and loathed by Democrats, says he has done nothing improper or unethical. House Republicans "feel this is nothing but a political witch hunt and an attempt to tear down Tom DeLay through personal attacks and destructive tactics when they just can't beat him legislatively," Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., said. Some Democrats and watchdog groups, however, say such explanations are wearing thin, especially in light of two rebukes -- one in 1999, one this week -- from an ethics panel evenly divided between Republicans and Democrats. "A lot of members on Capitol Hill believe in the concept of 'three strikes you're out,' " said Fred Wertheimer, a longtime advocate of public ethics and president of Democracy 21. "And Mr. DeLay has two strikes and a third case pending." Because the Texas indictments stem from allegations central to the pending complaint, Ornstein said, the ethics panel, known as the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, will be under political and public pressure to at least start a formal investigation before Congress adjourns next month. That could be enough to trigger a new round of attacks on DeLay that -- even if the investigation eventually proves fruitless -- would give the impression his ethical problems have reached critical mass, some Democrats and liberal groups said. "The rebuke of Tom DeLay by the ethics committee is yet another ethical cloud hanging over the Capitol," said House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. The liberal Campaign for America's Future called on Republicans to oust DeLay from this leadership post, and several groups -- including Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington -- demanded that the ethics committee aggressively pursue the pending complaint, filed in June by Rep. Chris Bell, D-Texas. Some Democrats say DeLay's ethics battles already are making him less potent on the campaign trail. A recent New Orleans Times-Picayune article on GOP House candidate Billy Tauzin III was headlined "DeLay's stumping for Tauzin is scaled back after scandal." Nonetheless, said George Washington University public affairs professor Stephen Hess, the accumulation of accusations should trouble DeLay's friends because "the history of these things is that eventually it does wear down" a politician's support. sfgate.com

To: steve harris who wrote (204643)	10/2/2004 3:00:36 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572893

Al-Qaida tape urges Muslims to attack U.S. and its allies indystar.com