Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (146884)	10/1/2004 11:06:19 PM
From: Win Smith	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Cool, a totally idiotic satirical blog now becomes a "reputable source" in true believer terminology. Maybe you can get LindyBill back here to quote Rush sucking up to Zell Miller again, just to round out the "fairandbalanced" commentary.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (146884)	10/2/2004 11:36:25 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 281500

Did anyone notice the huge difference they had when they agreed about nuclear proliferatin as the biggest problem facing us. Kerry went back to his disarmament theme from long ago talking about mutual disarmament as if china, russia are our biggest adversaries or perhaps when NK gets rid of its 3 weapons we should disarm as well. Bush otoh made it clear that he would do no such thing. He was talking about nukes and wmds in the hands of terrorists and terror supporting states. No talk of disarmamnet there at all yet the press said that was the one area of agreement after the debate. Responsible nuclear powers led by the US but also including russia, china, india and hopefully pakistan have a responsibility to make sure wmds dont get in the hands of terrorists or terror states. So here is a yes vote for the bunker busting nukes. When wmds are actually located in the hands of these folks, the nuke states led by us have a responsibility to destroy them by any means necessary. Mike