SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (204741)10/2/2004 10:38:04 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573130
 
The improprieties in the Florida election did not occur any more often than any other state or any other election.


Perhaps before the voting rights act. The effort to selectively disenfranchise black voters had not been seen since the Jim Crow laws were struck down.

TP



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (204741)10/7/2004 2:16:04 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573130
 
Ted, let's get one thing clear. The improprieties in the Florida election did not occur any more often than any other state or any other election.

Yes, the problems were worse than other states. We had a close senatorial race here in WA state. State law required a recount. There were few improprieties and the recount was done in a few days. FLA behaved like a banana republic. And Mr. Bush's bro runs it. I guess incompetency runs in the family. ;~)

By the way, I don't care if Gore supporters have a bad taste in their mouths. That's their problem. The few who are trying to make it everyone else's problem give the rest a very bad name.

Go read the Constitution. You gave yourselves a very bad name running to the USSC. Stop trying to pass off the blame on someone else.