Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elroy who wrote (204762)	10/3/2004 10:49:12 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572893

Ahhhh, give him a chance. It would be hard for him to do as poorly as Bush considering the resources the President has available, and Kerry actually seems sort of smart. I get it, the ABB argument. Well, that's nonsense. Bill Clinton's weakness brought us Nukes in NK. Bill Clinton's "management by politicking" (you remember, when he allowed Saddam to run over us in the first place by tolerating the denial of access to weapons inspectors) is what brought us to the Iraq problem in the first place. Clinton's unwillingness to make a hard decision left bin Laden free in the first place. And Clinton's lack of principles caused him to sell pardons to the highest bidder. I'm not saying the Kerry is Clinton. But I am saying that we can never allow a liberal to occupy the office again. Liberals cannot distinguish right from wrong because they chronically blur the line between the two. Kerry has shown his willingness to do this, ad nauseum, on the Iraq issue. Kerry would be a disaster. We cannot have a weak, waffling president at this critical time. You cannot credibly make an argument that Kerry isn't weak and waffling. It amazes me that otherwise intelligent people are so gullible they can be sucked in by Kerry's rhetoric.