Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (204779)	10/3/2004 10:30:21 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572777

"Do you accept these historical quotes from kerry as fact?" Sure. It is perfectly conceivable that someone would support the use of force as a last resort and then feel that it was used well before there weren't any more choices. In addition, while Kerry did say he voted for the $87 billion before he voted against it, it is never mentioned that Bush had categorically stated he would veto any version of the bill that wasn't an unfunded, blanket authorization. Kerry voted for a version that included at least some funding for it and included some benefits for the families of the National Guard and reserve. If it was so important to support the troops, why did Bush chose to play politics and threaten to veto it if it passed? Kerry wasn't my choice for the Democratic candidate. However, he is better than Bush in so many respects.

To: steve harris who wrote (204779)	10/3/2004 10:47:00 AM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 1572777

the same ones who were complaining that Bush-One didn't finish the job. No, that was your right winger neocons too. Wolfowitz was leading the charge that Bush 1 was a wimp and that Junior should show him how to whup Iraq. TP