Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (204865)	10/5/2004 3:10:58 AM
From: Elroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573104

OTOH, it is crystal clear that Bush does have a plan. And I strongly disagree with any complaint about making it a "war" vs. a "police action". This is a WAR, and it is critical that it be treated as such. I believe Kerry would have treated it as a police action, although there is no way in hell he would admit it now. Well if the current campaign against Islamic terrorism is best described as a "war", would you support invasions of and regime change in Columbia, Ecuador, Venezuela, Mexico, and Peru as part of the "War on Drugs"? Regime change in foreign countries requires war. Building a pro-Western democracy requires diplomacy. The two are totally different, and require different skill sets. The first is easy (the US has the strongest military in the world, and will win any war it chooses), the second is hard, but they are not the same thing.