Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (204912)	10/3/2004 11:17:21 PM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 1573433

Scalia got involved in selecting the outcome when the republicans promised to give his son a high paying job in the administration. Scalia has more kids, and more favors to give. TP

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (204912)	10/4/2004 3:45:44 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573433

Clinton refused to open the office set aside for the new President. Perhaps he was rehearsing his next court testimony at it. Our country is ill served by dragging a farce out for months. The US Constitution has provisions for just that kind of electoral situation. Our country was ill served by not getting the issue resolved satisfactorily to all parties and by allowing the USSC to determine the election. There is no provision in the Constitution for such a SC gambit. However, the GOP doesn't care about fairness or honesty; its only concerned with winning.