Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (26913)	10/4/2004 12:47:59 AM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 173976

This puts all of the demonization of Wolfowitz by Democrats ad their allies in the press in perspective. He is a man of pre-Christian faith that has wondered off the reservation. People of African descent who wonder off the reservation must be destroyed. So must Wolfowitz. Thank you,

To: jttmab who wrote (26913)	10/4/2004 7:48:14 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 173976

That's one of the most absurd posts I've seen here. Nah - strike that - too tough to make judgements in this goofy neighborhood. You basically are saying that Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice and so many other "advisors" have no voice. What idiotic extremist conspiracy theorists of both the left and the right forget is that all administrations have people from both ends of the political middle and that a consensus is usually reached, with those very upset (rare in fact) resigning in a quiet way. Clinton, Gore, Lieberman, and Kerry would have invaded Iraq IMO. I would like to think that they may have handled some of the details a bit better or perhaps not rushed as much but I don't think so. Any President would have had a time frame, with the election as the terminus, such that the war had to start at the time. I'm not saying I like that. In fact, I don't. I'm just saying the political process is such that what I posted and that to which you object in my post is more a truism than my opinion of who is "right" or "wrong."