Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LPS5 who wrote (8463)	10/4/2004 4:46:02 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20039

Really, it was directed to root out the Uzbekistani double-double secret agents that are so prevalent among our intel staff. Certain top-echelon State Dept. officials could plant the rumour, whereby it would travel to Mossad, and certainly be picked up at the dropbox near the Big-Bowl-of-Falafel fast food franchise on 3rd Street in Tashkent, around 2pm every 3rd Wednesday of the month. The reply phrase is "Welcome frequent customer." If one checked the job applications of the 1-HB janitorial crews, a surprising amount of "demolition experience" would probably be found among the skills & qualifications entries. Of course, the cleverness of the whole plan is that their employment paperwork went up in smoke with the buildings. The planes weren't critical to the job, as the plans were already in place to hijack (via remote-control) the big Disney and Simpsons balloons during Macy's Thanksgiving Parade. Secretly filled with hydrogen, a few hundred of those would make the Hindenburg look like a weenie roast. The only mystery that remains is how the White House expected to keep the intricacies of such a diabolical plan hidden from the erudite purveyors of this thread. The State dept. should have consulted here first, probably picking up some "real good tips" for the mission's success.

To: LPS5 who wrote (8463)	10/5/2004 1:16:04 AM
From: Don Earl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20039

"how would you undertake explaining the rather confusing brinksmanship behind - as your theory appears to have it - the government launching an attack against its own people while simultaneously seeding the various intelligence-gathering services with information to that exact effect?" If you were planning to murder your wife, what better way to eliminate yourself as a suspect than to spread rumors that someone else is out to get her? Especially if the person you plan to frame for the crime is also on your hit list? Blaming someone else for a crime is hardly a novel concept, and neither is the idea of setting them up for a fall ahead of the fact. The urgent reports received by the White House are certainly a lot easier to explain as being accepted as progress reports on planted evidence, than it is to explain why concerned leaders totally ignored warnings of impending doom for thousands of the citizens they are sworn to protect. You really shouldn't drink the bong water. It appears to be affecting your reason. I'll be glad when the ignore feature is back up. Finding your sort of nonsense in my inbox is a horrible waste of time