SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (205071)10/4/2004 8:40:32 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1587524
 
re: He was a bit early. A year or two but not 10 years.

You don't remember him posting on Prodigy, before the "WWW"?



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (205071)10/4/2004 8:49:29 PM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1587524
 
re: With the "poor" state of the economy you lay on Bush it's interesting that you now think everything will be hunky dory for the next term. I suppose you think Kerry will magically take the candy away from the baby (public) and laying more taxes on the rich will do the trick?

"Hunky dory"? I don't know if it will take 10, 20, 30 years to undo the Bush harm. You are right it will take years to get taxes in line with spending, but that's what fiscal conservatives do. Starting to tax "the rich" at a fair level is a good start, but more needs to be done on the spending and tax side. Bush's credit card governemnt needs to end ,now, and we'll pay with a recession. We'll pay, the next generation will get the benefit. But that's the way it works.

John



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (205071)10/5/2004 12:11:47 AM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1587524
 
With the "poor" state of the economy you lay on Bush it's interesting that you now think everything will be hunky dory for the next term. I suppose you think Kerry will magically take the candy away from the baby (public) and laying more taxes on the rich will do the trick?


Not at all.........I think things will get much worse before they get better esp. if China's growth slows as The Economist suggests it will