Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (205096)	10/5/2004 12:37:58 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1574264

>1) That he was given an advantage for entry over others because of his father. >2) That his service performance was not of good quality. That he behaved in the service much like he behaved in his life to date.......like a spoiled, pampered dilettante. >3) That his campaign encouraged the swifties to attack Kerry and his medals; a man who did serve his country honorably and did not try to avoid fighting in the war. None of the above would matter to me in voting for President, all other things being equal, except for #3. That was dirty. The first two mattered to me because they show the quality of his character and his lack of discipline. If it stopped there, that would be fine. But it has continued right up to the 1990s. ted