SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : John Kerry for President Free speach thread NON-CENSORED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/5/2004 3:11:02 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
Reality of Draft is...........

collegian.com

wnd.com

wcpo.com

truthnews.net

abclocal.go.com

abclocal.go.com



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/8/2004 1:52:25 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
Saddam's big scam Oil-for-food cash used for bribery

By AP
Fri, October 8, 2004



NEW YORK -- Suitcases full of cash, secret bank accounts, covert operatives, corrupt politicians on the take. A report detailing alleged illicit UN oil-for-food deals with the former Iraqi government paints involved cloak-and-dagger efforts to hide the alleged graft by dealing in front companies, untraceable accounts, cash sales and smuggling, the report by the top U.S. arms inspector said.

The report, delivered Wednesday by Charles Duelfer, who was charged to investigate the extent of Iraq's weapons programs, relies on internal Iraqi documents and extensive interviews with members of the former regime now imprisoned in Iraq.

Saddam was able to "subvert" the $60-billion US UN oil-for-food program to generate an estimated $1.7 billion in revenue outside UN control from 1997-2003, Duelfer's report said.

In addition to oil-for-food schemes, Iraq brought in over $8 billion in illicit oil deals with Jordan, Syria, Turkey and Egypt during the full period sanctions were in place from 1991-2003, the report said.

RUSSIAN AND FRENCH COMPANIES

Iraq tried to manipulate foreign governments, including members of the UN Security Council by awarding contracts -- and bribes -- to foreign companies and political figures in countries who showed support for ending sanctions, in particular Russia, France and China, the report said.

The former head of the oil-for-food program, Benon Sevan, is also accused of receiving bribes.

Russian and French companies were singled out by the regime for special treatment, said the report, with politicians close to French President Jacques Chirac appearing on list, among them former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua and businessman Patrick Maugein, "whom the Iraqis considered a conduit to Chirac," said the report.

The report said this allegation is unproven and the governments and officials deny it.



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/9/2004 1:37:34 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
web.archive.org*/http://kerry.senate.gov



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/9/2004 1:40:53 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
John Edwards's Skeleton Closet realchange.org



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/9/2004 1:43:44 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1449
 
John Kerry's Skeleton Closet realchange.org



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/9/2004 3:55:04 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
RE:Rush Limbaugh/Cortislim and FTC action

Cortislim is marketed as a dietary suppliment with no need for FDA approval They can make all kinds of wild claims about its effectiveness with no proof. This stuff is heavilly marketed on right-wing talk radio shows like Rush Limbaugh, I guess that market segment will believe anything. I just heard the Cordislim ad the other day on Rush's show. Someone should inform him of the FTC action. lol

================================================

FTC Targets Products Claiming to Affect the Stress Hormone Cortisol For Release: October 5, 2004

Agency Alleges That Marketers of CORTISLIM and CortiStress Made False or Unsubstantiated Claims

The Federal Trade Commission has charged marketers of two dietary supplements with claiming, falsely and without substantiation, that their products can cause weight loss and reduce the risk of, or prevent, serious health conditions. According to the FTC’s complaint, Los Angeles-area marketers Window Rock Enterprises, Inc. and Infinity Advertising, Inc., their principals, Stephen Cheng and Gregory Cynaumon, and business partner and product formulator Shawn Talbott have sold “CORTISLIM” and “CortiStress” through a number of widely aired infomercials and short TV commercials, as well as radio and print advertisements and Internet Web sites.
“The Window Rock defendants’ weight-loss and disease-prevention claims fly in the face of reality,” said Lydia B. Parnes, Acting Director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. “No pill can replace a healthy program of diet and exercise.”

The FTC’s complaint alleges that the Window Rock defendants violated the FTC Act by making deceptive efficacy claims for CORTISLIM and CortiStress. In addition, the complaint alleges that the defendants violated the FTC Act by using a deceptive format in at least two of their infomercials to suggest falsely that the infomercials were independent television programs, rather than paid commercial advertising. The complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, including redress for consumers who purchased the products.

CORTISLIM

According to the FTC, the defendants began marketing CORTISLIM in August 2003, through nationally disseminated infomercials featuring Cynaumon and Talbott that aired on anumber of television channels, including Access Television, Travel Channel, and Discovery Channel. The FTC alleges that the defendants promoted cortisol control as “the answer” for
anyone who wants to lose weight, especially abdominal weight. According to the FTC’s
complaint, the defendants’ broadcast ads, print ads, and Web sites claimed that persistently elevated levels of cortisol, the “stress hormone,” are the underlying cause of weight gain and weight retention and also claimed that CORTISLIM effectively reduces and controls cortisol levels and thereby causes substantial weight loss. The FTC alleges that the defendants claimed that CORTISLIM: (1) causes weight loss of 10 to 50 pounds for virtually all users; (2) causes users to lose as much as 4 to 10 pounds per week over multiple weeks; (3) causes users to lose weight specifically from the abdomen, stomach, and thighs; (4) causes rapid and substantial weight loss; (5) causes long-term or permanent weight loss; and (6) causes weight loss. The FTC also alleges that the defendants claimed that the effectiveness of CORTISLIM and its ingredients is demonstrated by over 15 years of scientific research. According to the FTC’s complaint, these claims are false or unsubstantiated.

CortiStress

According to the FTC, the defendants began marketing CortiStress in September 2003, through a nationally disseminated infomercial, also featuring Cynaumon and Talbott, that aired on a number of television channels, including TVN Direct. The FTC alleges that the defendants promoted cortisol control as “perhaps the most important aspect” of reducing health and disease risks. According to the FTC’s complaint, the defendants’ infomercial claimed that persistently elevated levels of cortisol are the underlying cause of “every modern lifestyle disease that is associated with this fast-paced 21st century lifestyle” and also claimed that CortiStress controls cortisol and thus should be taken “for as long as you want to have good health.” The FTC alleges that the defendants claimed that CortiStress reduces the risk of, or prevents, conditions such as osteoporosis, obesity, diabetes, Alzheimers’ disease, cancer, and cardiovascular disease. According to the FTC’s complaint, these claims are false or unsubstantiated.

Infomercial Format

The FTC’s complaint also alleges that the defendants produced their infomercials for CORTISLIM and CortiStress to look like episodes of a talk show called “Breakthroughs” that features Cynaumon as the “host.” According to the complaint, the “Breakthroughs” logo appears in the lower right-hand corner of the screen throughout one of the CORTISLIM infomercials. Cynaumon introduces Talbott as a “guest” he wanted on that particular “program” to tell the “audience” about Talbott’s scientific breakthrough regarding cortisol and his related product, either CORTISLIM or CortiStress. The infomercials do not indicate or otherwise reveal that Cynaumon and Talbott are part of a joint venture to create, manufacture, and market CORTISLIM and CortiStress. When a toll-free telephone number appears on-screen, Cynaumon presents the number for “more information” and states that callers who mention the “Breakthroughs” program will receive a special discount. According to the complaint, when the toll-free number appears on-screen, no oral or written disclaimer is provided to indicate that “Breakthroughs” is, in fact, a
paid advertisement for CORTISLIM or CortiStress; rather, the paid advertisement disclaimers appear only at the very beginning and very end of the infomercials.

The complaint against the Window Rock defendants signals the Commission’s continuing concern about the use of deceptive format in infomercials, and this is the second recent case to include an allegation that the format of the infomercial misleads consumers. In July 2004, the Commission filed charges, including a deceptive format charge, against the marketers of a product called “Supreme Greens with MSM.” In that case, the Commission won a preliminary injunction that prohibits efficacy claims for the product and requires clear “paid advertising” disclosures in any future infomercial advertising. (See press release dated July 1,
2004; www.ftc.gov/os/caselist/0233138/0233138.htm.

Stipulated Interim Agreement and Order

The Commission and the Window Rock defendants have also submitted a stipulated interim agreement that, with the court’s approval, will become an order. Under the agreement, advertising for CORTISLIM and CortiStress cannot make any of the claims alleged in the FTC’s complaint. In addition, the defendants agree to limit their future advertising to claims that are supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence and agree not to misrepresent that their products are supported by scientific studies. Finally, the defendants agree not to use any advertisement that misrepresents itself as something other than a paid advertisement, and they also agree to include appropriate “paid advertisement” disclaimers in their advertising.

FTC Warning Letters

In a related development, the FTC has begun sending warning letters to more than 25 Web site operators and others who are marketing products with claims that the products will affect cortisol and thereby cause weight loss, reduce the risk of or prevent disease, or produce other health benefits. In its warning letters, the FTC states that it is not aware of any competent and reliable scientific evidence to support those claims and warns that unsupported claims are unlawful under the FTC Act. Accordingly, the FTC’s warning letters instruct the Web site operators and other marketers to discontinue any false or deceptive claims immediately.

FDA Warning Letter

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) also has taken regulatory action against the marketers of CORTISLIM. On August 19, 2004, the FDA sent a warning letter to Stephen Cheng and Window Rock Enterprises, Inc., stating that the dietary supplement CORTISLIM is misbranded and violates the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act). According to the FDA’s letter, CORTISLIM’s label and accompanying information make unsubstantiated claims that CORTISLIM “eliminates cravings,” “controls appetite,” “burn[s] calories more efficiently and naturally through thermogenesis,” and “diminishe[s] hunger and stress eating.” The FDA also asserts that claims that CORTISLIM “supports healthy cortisol levels” or “supports weight maintenance efforts” would be unsubstantiated. FDA further expressed to the firm that if prompt action to correct these violations was not taken, enforcement action may be initiated without further notice. The Act provides for seizure of illegal products and for an injunction against the manufacturer and/or distributor of illegal products. For additional information and a copy of the warning letter, please visit the FDA’s Web site, www.fda.gov.

“We will take appropriate enforcement action against firms that promote dietary supplement products with unsubstantiated claims about the benefits of the product,” said Dr. Lester M. Crawford, Acting FDA Commissioner. “Consumers rely on the claimed benefits of the product, and we owe it to them that such claims be supported by competent and reliable scientific evidence.”

The Commission vote to authorize staff to file the complaint was 5-0. The complaint and the stipulated interim agreement and order were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California on September 30, 2004.

NOTE: The Commission files a complaint when it has “reason to believe” that the law has been or is being violated, and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The complaint is not a finding or ruling that the defendant has actually violated the law. The case will be decided by the court.

Copies of the complaint, the stipulated interim agreement and order, and a sample warning letter are available from the FTC’s Web site at ftc.gov and also from the FTC’s Consumer Response Center, Room 130, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20580. The FTC works for the consumer to prevent fraudulent, deceptive, and unfair business practices in the marketplace and to provide information to help consumers spot, stop, and avoid them. To file a complaint in English or Spanish (bilingual counselors are available to take complaints), or to get free information on any of 150 consumer topics, call toll-free, 1-877-FTC-HELP (1-877-382-4357), or use the complaint form at ftc.gov. The FTC enters Internet, telemarketing, identity theft, and other fraud-related complaints into Consumer Sentinel, a secure, online database available to hundreds of civil and criminal law enforcement agencies in the U.S. and abroad.

MEDIA CONTACT:

Brenda Mack,
Office of Public Affairs
202-326-2182

STAFF CONTACT:

Heather Hippsley or Peter Miller
Bureau of Consumer Protection
202-326-3285 or 202-326-2629

(FTC File No. 042-3057) (Civil Action No. CV04-8190 DSF (JTLx))

(http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/10/windowrock.htm)



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/10/2004 6:14:03 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
The saga continues

pittsburghlive.com
Sunday, October 10, 2004

The Clintons could be in a hep o' trouble.
Not only could a key witness cut a deal with federal prosecutors and give up Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign in a finance fraud case, Mrs. Clinton and former President Bill Clinton soon could find themselves in the docket in a serious civil lawsuit they desperately are hoping to stop:

= The Justice Department says it has evidence that Hillary Clinton's 2000 campaign for the U.S. Senate deliberately low-balled costs associated with a fund-raising event. That, supposedly, to free up more money for electioneering.

Peter Paul, a three-time felon currently under indictment for stock fraud charges in New York, claims he underwrote most of the cost of the August 2000 star-studded Hollywood gala. Prosecutors say he did so in hopes of securing a presidential pardon that never came. Mr. Paul and the Clintons have denied the allegation. Clinton's campaign denies any fund-raising chicanery.

= In a second matter, the Clintons have filed an appeal with the California Supreme Court in an attempt to stop a lawsuit filed by Paul. Acting on Paul's behalf, Judicial Watch contends Mr. Clinton reneged on a $17 million deal to work for two Paul Internet companies.

The lawsuit says none of Paul's expenses -- $2 million he spent to put on the Hollywood gala that also was part of the business deal -- were reported as required to the Federal Election Commission.

The Clinton saga continues. More's the pity.



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/10/2004 9:40:32 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 1449
 
Report: 6,000 Felons On Voter Registration Lists

POSTED: 2:50 pm MDT October 10, 2004

DENVER -- Some 6,000 prisoners and felons on parole are on the state's voter registration rolls, The Denver Post reported Sunday.

State law bars prisoners serving sentences or convicted felons who are on parole from voting.

The Post reported that Secretary of State Donetta Davidson plans to convene an emergency meeting this week of Colorado's 64 county clerks to stop prisoners and parolees from voting on Nov. 2. Some prisoners and parolees voted in the August primary.

"I had no idea we had that type of numbers," Davidson said.

"You have to wonder if they're malicious or inept in the secretary of state's office. Every ineligible elector that votes cancels the vote of an eligible elector," said Al Kowicz, executive director of Accurate Mail Election Election Results, an election watchdog group based in Boulder.

The Post said 40 percent of the 6,006 felons on voting lists are on parole or in community-supervision programs that would permit them to visit polling stations. Records through September showed 536 felons registered this year. Some were signed up during registration drives that have added tens of thousands of potential voters to the registration rolls since March.

One problem is that the state corrections department does not send a list of felons to the secretary of state's office.

"We can only act on the information provided us. This particular issue is a matter for corrections to address," said Bill Compton, state elections director.

"We send data sets to agencies that request the information," said Alison Morgan, spokeswoman for corrections.



To: SEC-ond-chance who wrote (30)10/11/2004 5:29:22 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1449
 
Happy Halloween!! charts.dacharts.com