Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (205337)	10/6/2004 12:02:44 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573952

why would a high ranking gov't "who is not a political appointee" give or leak such info to a rather minor website in the media business? Could it be because they know the liberal biased media lead by the discredited CBS would never get a story like this out? If that were the case, and we both know it isn't, why not leak the info to FOX News or the NRO? Both are considered to be two of the best conservative media outlets. why would the WH not release the info publicly? Please correct my misunderstanding. I thought leak meant that it was leaked. That means it is not sanctioned by the organization which was holding it. Your accusations about Republican offices and appointees appear to be irrelevant. You're joking? Releasing that info would make Bush look good! It really burns the left wingnuts that the proof is out. Yes, the five formerly mainstream TV media are wholly owned subsidiaries of the Democrat party. And yes, the NY Times gives them their marching orders. No, it really burns the left when you all lie. Get back to me when you can put aside your partisanship and talk like a normal human being. Wingnuts? What planet are you all from? Mars?