SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abuelita who wrote (58657)10/6/2004 12:22:54 AM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
No. They want the marriage part to become entitled to benefits, medical, death. They don't want to be excluded from the hospital if their loved ones are dying. Marriage gives them this license. Edwards' plan to change the laws so that those involved in long-term relationships without the benefit of marriage would still be beneficiaries. And I agree, marriage is a union between a man and a woman, NOT a man and a man or a woman and her dog.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News