Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (205438)	10/6/2004 3:34:58 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574273

Your responses are confusing me. What is it that you think the UN is good for then? Not much now except providing a global forum. However, in the future, I see it becoming an umbrella for the entire world of nations much like the EU is becoming for Europe. In what ways do you feel we need to subjugate ourselves to the UN? I didn't say subjugate but rather cooperate with them. And not run away when we can't run the debate. Don't you see something truly obscene about the makeup of the HRC? What the hell is the HRC? The most important body in the UN is the Sec. Council. Everything is cake icing. You said you don't like the freerepublic.com because they might say something to support the President. Is it reasonable to assume then that you don't like CBS, NBC, ABC< CNN, PBS, Reuters, or AP because they overwhelmingly "report" in a way that supports Democrats, and Kerry? I don't like those alternative sites because in their eyes, there is nothing the current president does that is wrong. They are ideologically based to the point where they are hardly ever professional and hardly ever provide objective journalism. With the mainstream media that you cite, there is at least an attempt at professionalism and objectivity.