SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doug R who wrote (639411)10/6/2004 11:17:18 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Wednesday, October 06, 2004
What They're Saying: Vice Presidential Debate, Volume Four

USA Today: "Edwards Repeatedly Was Forced To Defend The Democratic Nominee, Reducing His Opportunities To Criticize President Bush." ("Deep Divisions Characterize VP Debate," USA Today, 10/6/04)

The Washington Post: "Last Night Mr. Edwards Persisted In Some Lines Of Criticism That We Consider To Be Unsupported Demagoguery, In Particular Hints Of Misconduct Swirling Around Mr. Cheney And Halliburton Co." (Editorial, "Cheney Vs. Edwards," The Washington Post, 10/6/04)

Los Angeles Times: "Edwards Was Unpersuasive That His Ticket Offered A Significantly Different Approach For Ensuring A Successful Endgame" In Iraq. (Editorial, "Edwards Woos Another Jury," Los Angeles Times, 10/6/04)

Former Clinton Aide Dick Morris: John Edwards "Looked Like The Proverbial Deer In The Headlights." "Confronted with Dick Cheney's obvious competence, incisive parries to his charges and devastating rebuttal of his phony statistics, Edwards looked like the proverbial deer in the headlights. … John Edwards made it look like the Democratic ticket was out classed and out gunned." (Dick Morris, "Deer In The Headlights," The New York Post, 10/6/04)

The Washington Post: Vice President Cheney "Was Right To Chide The Kerry-Edwards Team For Appearing Insufficiently Appreciative Of The Allies And Iraqis Who Have Fought Alongside U.S. Troops." (Editorial, "Cheney Vs. Edwards," The Washington Post, 10/6/04)

Los Angeles Times' Ron Brownstein: Vice President Cheney "Quickly Settled Into A Presentation That Was Confident And Forceful." (Ron Brownstein, "An Effort To Shift The Focus To The Other Guy," Los Angeles Times, 10/6/04)

The Boston Globe's Peter Canellos: "Edwards, At Times, Failed To Answer The Questions As Directed To Him." (Peter S. Canellos, "Unleashed Bitterness Marks VP Face-Off," The Boston Globe, 10/6/04)

Los Angeles Times' Paul Brownfield: "Cheney Repeatedly Upbraided Edwards For What, In His Mind, Amounted To Flabby Thinking." (Paul Brownfield, Op-Ed, "Cheney Had Wonkiness Nailed," Los Angeles Times, 10/6/04)

New York Post Columnist John Podhoretz: "But In The End, It Was Cheney's Night Pretty Decisively. He Banged On Edwards Like A Drum, And While The North Carolina Senator Tried To Give As Good As He Was Getting, He Never Really Blunted The Vice President's Relentless March Forward." (John Podhoretz, "The Veep Debate: Cheney Rocks," The New York Post, 10/6/04)

Dartmouth College Political Science Professor Linda Fowler Said "Cheney Continued To Drive Home The Administration's Case That Kerry Is Not Fit To Be President." (Yvonne Abraham, "Some Hard Punches, But No Knockout Blows," The Boston Globe, 10/6/04)

SUNY Political Science Professor Bruce Altschuler Said Vice President Cheney "Seemed Somewhat More In Command Of The Facts, And To Be Able To Provide Specifics." (Yvonne Abraham, "Some Hard Punches, But No Knockout Blows," The Boston Globe, 10/6/04)



To: Doug R who wrote (639411)10/6/2004 11:18:11 AM
From: puborectalis  Respond to of 769670
 
Report Discounts Iraqi Arms Threat



By Mike Allen and Dana Priest, Washington Post Staff Writers

The government's most definitive account of Iraq (news - web sites)'s arms programs, to be released today, will show that Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) posed a diminishing threat at the time the United States invaded and did not possess, or have concrete plans to develop, nuclear, chemical or biological weapons, U.S. officials said yesterday.

The officials said that the 1,000-page report by Charles A. Duelfer, the chief U.S. weapons inspector in Iraq, concluded that Hussein had the desire but not the means to produce unconventional weapons that could threaten his neighbors or the West. President Bush (news - web sites) has continued to assert in his campaign stump speech that Iraq had posed "a gathering threat."

The officials said Duelfer, an experienced former United Nations (news - web sites) weapons inspector, found that the state of Hussein's weapons-development programs and knowledge base was less advanced in 2003, when the war began, than it was in 1998, when international inspectors left Iraq.

"They have not found anything yet," said one U.S. official who had been briefed on the report.

A senior U.S. government official said that the report includes comments Hussein made to debriefers after his capture that bolster administration assertions, including his statement that his past possession of weapons of mass destruction "was one of the reasons he had survived so long." He also maintained such weapons saved his government by halting Iranian ground offensives during the Iran-Iraq war and deterred coalition forces from pressing on to Baghdad during the 1991 Persian Gulf War (news - web sites), the official said.

The official also said that Duelfer's Iraq Survey Group had uncovered Iraqi plans for ballistic missiles with ranges from 400 to 1,000 kilometers and for a 1,000-kilometer-range cruise missile, farther than the 150-kilometer range permitted by the United Nations, the senior official said.

The official said Duelfer will tell Congress in the report and in testimony today that Hussein intended to reconstitute weapons of mass destruction programs if he were freed of the U.N. sanctions that prevented him from getting needed materials.

Duelfer's report said Hussein was pursuing an aggressive effort to subvert the international sanctions through illegal financing and procurement efforts, officials said. The official said the report states that Hussein had the intent to resume full-scale weapons of mass destruction efforts after the sanctions were eliminated, and details Hussein's efforts to hinder international inspectors and preserve his weapons of mass destruction capabilities.

Rep. Jane Harman (news, bio, voting record) (D-Calif.), vice chairman of the House intelligence committee, said she had not read Duelfer's report but has been told that it thoroughly undercuts the administration's assertions that Iraq posed a serious threat.

"Intentions do not constitute a growing danger," Harman said. "It's hardly mushroom clouds, hardly stockpiles," she added, a reference to administration rhetoric used in the run-up to the war.

The report's release comes at a point in the presidential campaign when Democratic candidate John F. Kerry is aggressively challenging the Bush administration about its prewar justifications for invading Iraq, which centered largely on the contention that Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction. People familiar with the report said it is being released today because Duelfer was ready and his schedule permitted him to testify to Congress.

Yesterday, administration officials discussed some of the report's findings publicly, arguing that it showed Hussein was a long-term threat even though no weapons of mass destruction were found.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan called Hussein's effort to evade the U.N. sanctions "very revealing." "We all thought that we would find stockpiles, and that was not the case," McClellan said.

"The fact that he had the intent and capability, and that he was trying to undermine the sanctions that were in place is very disturbing. And I think the report will continue to show that he was a gathering threat that needed to be taken seriously, that it was a matter of time before he was going to begin pursuing those weapons of mass destruction."

The report includes page after page of names of individuals and companies -- many from China, Russia and France -- that had traded illegally with Iraq, the senior government official said. The State Department began briefing the named governments on the report yesterday, the official said.

Duelfer's findings follow reports by the Senate intelligence committee and his predecessor, David A. Kay, that criticized the prewar assessment that Iraq had chemical and biological weapons. But Bush has pointed to the Duelfer report as the last word on the state of Iraq's weapons programs. Asked in June if he thought such weapons had existed in Iraq, Bush said he would "wait until Charlie gets back with the final report."

Another government official who was briefed on the report said that many U.S. officials had thought Hussein would "get down to business" in developing weapons when the U.N. inspectors left. "There's no evidence of that," the official said.



The official said that Iraq's nuclear-related activity in particular had been dormant for years before the invasion. "They probably didn't have a program for some period of time, well before we went in there," he said.

The Bush administration has held out the possibility that illicit weapons and their components were secreted by Hussein across the border into Syria. This may still be true, but Duelfer's team did not find any proof to support this notion, the official said. "They have no evidence of this," the official said. "It's an unresolved issue." Syria denies it aided the hiding of illicit materials.

Duelfer replaced Kay in January as the chief U.S. weapons hunter after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq. In title, he was the CIA (news - web sites)'s special adviser for strategy regarding Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. As head of the Iraq Survey Group, he worked independent of the CIA and his report was not vetted or changed by the agency, said one U.S. government official familiar with Duelfer's work.

The president met with Duelfer at the White House on Feb. 6. Bush said during a prime-time news conference in April that during Duelfer's return to Iraq, he had been "amazed at how deceptive the Iraqis had been" toward U.N. inspectors, as well as "deceptive in hiding things."

The report also includes an investigation of a broad range of subjects that are either loosely or not at all connected to weapons of mass destruction, a foreign intelligence official said. These include Iraq's conventional weapons programs, evidence of corruption and abuse in the U.N.-monitored oil-for-food program, and dual-use equipment -- which could be used for either peaceful or military programs -- that U.N. inspectors may not have been aware of.