SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RealMuLan who wrote (54040)10/6/2004 12:19:10 PM
From: brian h  Respond to of 74559
 
delete. A dup.



To: RealMuLan who wrote (54040)10/6/2004 12:20:20 PM
From: brian h  Respond to of 74559
 
"""""""""And why Jiang has resigned? Because of some corruption."""""""""

I did not know about these facts. Could you enlighten us? Does it have to do with TaiDu members as well? :-)

""""""""""At the present stage, if China were to adopt one person one vote system, there would be wide spread (in millions) “vote for cash” business, and the person who is most likely elected will be an extreme nationalist."""""""""""

The same old arguments. Just allow any Chinese to freely speak of their minds (without actions under your most restrictive laws) are more important than a voting system fomality.

Why is the head of the state has to be a CCP member? Because CCP and you do not have a faith with Chinese abilities per Jay.

May be Jay can spare some time (besides being a new father) acts as the head of the state, can he not? Do you think he qualifies if he choose to do so? No. Why?

Can you or CCP without any reason paint any Chinese as a TaiDu member that has the intention (not even actions yet) to overthrow China? I do not have to remind you who just did it a while ago.

"""""""""""China should spend money somewhere .""""""""""

China can buy all those military equipments for stopping TaiDu movements (not national defenses. I quote here.) according to your previous post . They can not spare some changes for their people? I thought "People of Republic of China" means people first. Not?

BH



To: RealMuLan who wrote (54040)10/6/2004 6:42:55 PM
From: Taikun  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
This

<And talk about socialist, Canada and the US now have more socialist welfare than China.>

is not the point. The point is Malcolm correctly pointed out about the remnants of the old system in China.

Why would China want to vote anyway? It wil just turn out like the fiasco in Hong Kong. They will preprint the referendum ballots like this:

Referendum #1

Do you agree or disagree with the one China policy?

Circle your response below:

Agree