SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kip S who wrote (41540)10/6/2004 9:29:24 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo  Respond to of 213185
 
Kip......Think you may have something there...and I may have mispoken.....Been saying for some time, operating from memory (which, at my age, can be risky....g)...that the gap began at 40.

But checking a chart now, I see the low on 9/28/00 at 48.13, and the high on 9/29/00 at 29.00.........so if that's correct, that is the way I would define the gap.

If you do any further checking, please keep me informed....When I have time tomorrow I will try to check a statistical data base.....And thanks.....

So maybe we should now raise our sights from 40 to 49 or 50 ?? .....VBG



To: Kip S who wrote (41540)10/6/2004 10:24:22 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213185
 
Kip....Staying up late....g.....Checked the historical record, which confirms that I was WRONG....correct gap does indeed appear to be 29.00-48.13.

No excuse, but what I may have had stuck in my mind was the presence of resistance at the early June and early August 2000 lows.......40.19 for the first, and 44.25 for the second.

So why don't we raise our sights to 44 now......vbg


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News