SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: puborectalis who wrote (639747)10/6/2004 10:25:58 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
the unemployment rate has increased..... ROTFLOL clearly Christmas in Cambodie informed bunch. Oh they have pices of paper that some take to mean they do not have the heads of their ass. the unemployment rate has increased..... ROTFLOL



To: puborectalis who wrote (639747)10/6/2004 10:27:55 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 769670
 
House Majority Leader Should Step Down Over Ethics Lapse, Says Judicial Watch

judicialwatch.org

Oct 6, 2004 Contact: Press Office
202-646-5172

House Majority Leader Should Step Down Over Ethics Lapse, Says Judicial Watch

DeLay’s Actions On Medicare Vote ‘Inappropriate,’ ‘Unacceptable’

(WASHINGTON, D.C.) Judicial Watch, the conservative public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today called on Rep. Tom DeLay to step down as House Majority Leader in the wake of the bipartisan House Ethics Committee’s recent findings that he acted improperly in attempting to win a vote from Rep. Nick Smith in exchange for endorsing Smith’s son in a congressional primary. It is the second time that DeLay has been chastised by the ethics panel.

Smith in December 2003 was pressured heavily by colleagues to vote in favor of the Medicare prescription drug bill. He claimed that in exchange for his support for the legislation several House members offered financial backing and endorsements for his son’s primary campaign. Smith voted against the legislation; his son lost his primary race in August.

A report issued Sept. 30 by the ethics committee [Click here to read the report.] – officially the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct – said that an investigative subcommittee recommended only that DeLay, Smith and Rep. Candice Miller should be publicly admonished for their conduct. DeLay admitted offering his endorsement to Smith’s son. Said the report: “In the view of the Investigative Subcommittee, this conduct could support a finding that Majority Leader DeLay violated House rules. … it is improper for a Member to offer or link support for the personal interests of another Member as part of a quid pro quo to achieve a legislative goal.” Miller said she told Smith she would not support his son; other witnesses said she vowed to help defeat him. Smith was cited for public statements he made in the weeks following the vote that he was offered “bribes” for his support for the Medicare bill, allegations for which the subcommittee says it found no evidence.

The ethics subcommittee focused most of its attention on Smith’s public statements, which the Michigan Republican made in several forums, about the efforts made by others to change his vote. Smith failed to fully cooperate with the subcommittee and back pedaled from his earlier allegations during testimony before the panel.

“Frankly, the ethics report was too kind to Mr. DeLay and the other House members implicated in the controversy. Mr. DeLay’s actions in trying to trade a political endorsement for a vote were inappropriate and unacceptable, and given this grave ethical lapse, he should step down as Majority Leader. The Republican Party should not countenance its leadership violating House rules and standards of ethical behavior,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.



To: puborectalis who wrote (639747)10/6/2004 11:06:52 PM
From: Doug R  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
More professors speak out:

America needs a change at the top. As professors and scholars of management, we are charged with educating the next generation of leaders. As citizens in a democracy, we take seriously our responsibility to speak out on matters of public policy, especially when the common good and the long term viability of the economy are at stake. We cannot be silent while the Administration of George W. Bush attacks the gains of working people over the past hundred years. It would be bad enough if the Bush administration were merely trying to turn the clock back to the "good old days" of untrammeled managerial prerogatives and unfettered markets. In reality, however, this administration is forging an ever more noxious mix of private economic interests and covert public power. Our economic, social, health, and environmental security is threatened as never before.

The Bush majority on the National Labor Relations Board has stripped rights from health care workers, denied protection to a significant fraction of private university employees, weakened penalties for egregious labor law violators, and challenged state laws banning the use of taxpayers' money in anti-union drives. The NLRB is supposed to enforce workers' rights, but the Bush administration seeks to make it the ally of union-busters. There is a gaping and expanding hole in American democracy.

The Bush administration has issued a regulation that denies millions of workers their right to overtime pay. The formation of the Department of Homeland Security has carried a huge price tag in compromised civil liberties, including the abolition of all collective bargaining rights for the 170,000 federal workers transferred into that huge department. Rules to limit the spread of tuberculosis have been dropped to please big business. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has become more "business friendly," which means that standards to protect workers from toxic chemicals are killed before they can help. Ten years of research on ergonomics were trashed because the Administration does not feel the pain of carpal tunnel syndrome. Bush's chief economist sees outsourcing as good as long as his job is secure.

We cannot remain silent as the Administration harnesses the power of government to serve the special interests of the super-rich at the expense of ordinary, working Americans. Most of our students stand to lose as their workplaces become more dangerous, their jobs less secure, their freedom of expression more constrained. Even an MBA degree cannot save you when the most powerful state on earth wages class war on its working people.

Paul Adler, U. of Southern California
Rose Batt, Cornell U.
Laurie DiPadova-Stocks, Park U.
Frank Dubois, American U.
Dale Fitzgibbons, Illinois State U.
Bernard Goitein, Bradley U.
Davydd J. Greenwood, Cornell University
Vanessa Hill, U. of Louisiana, Lafayette
Ray Hogler, Colorado State U.
David Jacobs, Hood College
Milton Jacobs, emeritus, SUNY-New Paltz
Anita Jose, Hood College
David Kolb, Case Western Reserve U.
Satish Kolluri, Pace University
David Levy, U. of Mass.-Boston
Sharon Livesey, Fordham U.
John Luhman, New Mexico State U.
Richard Marens, Cal.State U.-Sacramento
Biju Mathew, Rider U.
Ali Mir, William Patterson U.
Raza Mir, William Patterson U.
Ralph Stablein, Massey U.
Sarah Stookey, U. of Mass.-Amherst
Judy Strauss, Cal. State U.-Long Beach
John Truty, Northern Illinois U.
Ray Vegso, Canisius College
Vamsi Vakulabharanam, Queens College
Maxim Voronov, Columbia U.
Dvora Yanow, Cal. State U.-Hayward