Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (75411)	10/7/2004 12:24:47 PM
From: Neeka	Respond to of 793964

“We did not go to war because Saddam had future intentions to obtain weapons of mass destruction,” said Levin, ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee>>> Notice: Levin said this immediately after the release of a report that stated Saddam had future intentions to obtain weapons of mass destruction. The Democratic Party is simply not serious about national defense. Levin must not have been in mental attendance when Charles Duelfer gave his report. I wish there were another way.......miles of evidence doesn't count. 9/11 didn't happen, and unfortunately we know what is it going to take for liberals to understand this War. No, Levin didn't want to hear that part because for him Bush went to war in Iraq to avenge daddy. Or maybe for him it all boils down to having the power to negotiate or summit with the terrorist's creditors that supersedes all else? He is playing a dangerous game with the lives of American citizens and for that he should get the boot. M