SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: michael97123 who wrote (147227)10/7/2004 12:34:39 PM
From: Neocon  Respond to of 281500
 
A good point to add.....



To: michael97123 who wrote (147227)10/7/2004 12:55:30 PM
From: GST  Respond to of 281500
 
<Why has there been no attack on the United States in retaliation for the routing of Al Qaida?> The initial attacks on the world trade center were years apart. Nothing in their pattern of behavior suggest they would have attacked again so soon. They went for a big show and they got it. Their next big show would not be due for a while. Nothing we have done suggests that this country is secure against the next attack. And in the area of greatest concern -- nuclear weapons in the hands of terrorists and rogue states -- we are far less secure in the years that Bush has been in office.



To: michael97123 who wrote (147227)10/7/2004 12:58:06 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Iraq progressive? Give me a break Mike. We did not lay the groundwork for a "progressive" Iraq -- we laid the groundwork for a failed-state in which terrorism (once virtually unknown in Iraq) flourishes and grows unchecked.