Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Carragher who wrote (76025)	10/9/2004 12:24:19 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793841

>>Fox was more down on Bush than the other networks and cable stations after debate. Bush's concession on no WMD is tough on Fox, because they were beating the WMD drum long after it was clear that there were no WMD. Just as many here were. And I said then, "ya'll need to back off on this, because ultimately it's going to hurt Bush." And got so much flack I had to put a lot of people who used to be my friends on Ignore. But I was right, and they were wrong. And that's got to be tough on people like Bill Kristol. He's going to have to eat a lot of crow. And it's hard to eat crow. Scott Ritter was more right than they were. Where's the justice in that? I don't think it's any accident that the report came out AFTER the debate on foreign policy. FOX was in the depression/acceptance stage of this. When you're deaing with loss, tomorrow is a better day.