Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : GEEC - Global Environmental Energy Corp. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (24)	10/10/2004 10:00:26 PM
From: jmhollen	Respond to of 39

Well, it appears the *SI-ACLU* has made good on their threat to meddle with all the Moderated Boards on behalf of the whining, bahsing or personal-attacking "..arseholes..". Next will come the endless battle of "..Oh boo hoo, he banned me again.." and the tug of war between the SI_Admin(Meddlers) and the Moderators - where I suppose we will have to eventually ask permission to crap-can someone of the boards we created. It's amazing how these liberals act after they have your money. And that is something people should consider when going to the polls considering the Blustering Liberal Tax-&-Spender who is attempting to invade the White House. You'll never guess who my first ban was..........!?! And, I'm sure there will be a forced "..override.." or some other adminstrative retribution for exercising my Moderator's prerogative. John :-) .

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (24)	10/10/2004 10:03:45 PM
From: jmhollen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 39

O/T & FYI: Well, it appears the *"..SI-ACLU.."* has made good on their threat to meddle with all the Moderated Boards on behalf of the whining, bashng and/or personal-attacking "..known and proven arseholes..". Next will come the endless battle of *"...Oh boo hoo hoo, ..that mean-spirited person banned me again..."* and the Mother Hillary tug of war between the SI_Admin(Meddlers) and the Moderators. The end result of which will no doubt be that we will have to ask permission to crap-can someone off the boards we created. It's amazing how these liberals act after they have your money. And that is something people should consider when going to the polls considering the Blustering Liberal Tax-&-Spender who is attempting to invade the White House. Pretty much the same reason our Congress finally laughed Hillary out of Dodge after they saw her BS "..fix our terribly broken medical care system.." plans......... You'll never guess who my first ban was.......!!! And, I'm sure there will be a forced "..override.." or some other adminstrative retribution for exercising my Moderator's prerogative. They always seem to get real "..pizzy.." when you point out their foibles or give them a taste of their own crap. The usual reponse is the old Police Sergeant sputter, "..I have the Badge, so I'll ask the questions/give the orders, etc. etc., etc...."!!! John :-) .

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (24)	10/10/2004 10:54:57 PM
From: jmhollen	Respond to of 39

You will note, my "..jus' to show ya.." ban of SI-Dave was immediately overridden, so he could reitterate the liberal basher-supporting SI agenda. Just like RB and iHub, the dissention on the boards from bashing results in more posts-per-day, and that looks good when Bob Z goes out to peddal banner Ad-space to the stock spam-blasters, etc............ It's the same BS over on iHub. If you take the responsibility of starting and Moderating a board - every post you crap-can is essentially 'voted on' post-facto by "..Fathead Matt..". And, if the basher is on "..Fathead Matt's.." list of bash buddies - he reinstates their crap. iHub won't allow the creation of two boards under the same symbol, which would solve the problem. (A) it would take away from "..Fathead Matt's.." babysitting and Jailhouse duties - that he clearly loves. And apparently, iHub can't afford the extra Hard Drives or DDRAM chips to handle the additonal load...... John :-) .