Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (52352)	10/10/2004 10:19:54 PM
From: Amy J	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 81568

Chris, I've often wondered about that too. What is the real reason why Bush attacked Iraq? Does anyone know? I certainly don't. Was it because of oil? Is it because Bush wanted a foothold into the middle east to start influencing Saudia Arabia's policy where the terrorists originated from? The later reason would resonate better, but not the first one. But Bush's flip-flopping on the reason is very disturbing. It creates a huge trust issue. You just don't know when you can trust what Bush says. Regards, Amy J

To: bentway who wrote (52352)	10/10/2004 11:56:04 PM
From: techguerrilla	Respond to of 81568

I think the electorate is beginning to see it, Chris ..... .......... It just wanted to see Kerry and Bush on the same stage together. A lot of people were dissatisfied with Bush and didn't want to vote for him. Unfortunately, many were not "familiar" with Kerry. The contrast between Kerry and Bush at the first debate was unreal. Bush looked like a cross between Howdy Doody and Alfred E. Newman, whereas Kerry look assured and presidential. Then, at the second debate, Bush looked like Yosemite Sam. But he forgot to bring his six-shooter. Kerry continued to looked assured and presidential. Bush simply can't erase the devastation of the first debate. Events in Iraq keep him mired in mud. /john