Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (76439)	10/11/2004 12:46:59 PM
From: Bridge Player	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793755

On the war, Kerry almost eagerly made Bush's point, at first saying, "I do believe Saddam Hussein was a threat," and moments later denouncing Bush for being "preoccupied with Iraq, where there wasn't a threat." I have been very consistent on this issue all along. Saddam was a threat. Well, it was a different kind of threat. You were wrong, you thought he was a threat. But that was another threat. The threat I meant was a different threat. Besides, I always said he was a threat and should be removed. But Iraq, no, Iraq was not a threat. Only Saddam was a threat. Or his sons. They were the threat not Saddam. And besides the coalition doesn't exist, you went it alone. To eliminate the non-threat. When did I ever deny there was a theat? Ya think the Democratic Party could use me as a speech-writer?