Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (642463)	10/11/2004 8:19:36 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq - bad..." Looks bad because the VP is a former CEO of the company (hardly what I'd call arms-length).... Oh, and by the way, where do you think Cheney's next diretorship will come from when he's through with public life. He'll get some nice plum posting from Haliburton, or do you think not?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (642463)	10/11/2004 8:22:25 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia - good... Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq - bad... And Bush's efforts lead to more than ONE THOUSAND DEAD AMERICANS in Iraq! I'll take Clinton's war making methods any day of the week. Recall the invasion of Haiti, not a shot fired, not one American dead. Oh, but I forgot, Clinton new the virtues of dialogue, whereas the current president prefers to snub his fellow international leaders whenever he can.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (642463)	10/11/2004 8:24:10 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia - good... Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad..." Clinton's moves led to a cessation of people dying... Do you see that in Iraq? It makes sense that you recognize Clinton's moves as good and Bush's as bad.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (642463)	10/11/2004 8:27:24 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists - good... Bush liberates 25 million from a genocidal dictator - bad..." Clinton did so at minimal collateral damage to Serbs and Muslims. Not so for Mr. Bush, his methods of liberation led to the destruction of Iraqi infrastructure, vioence, mayhem, looting total chaos. Again, Clinton knew what he was doing, Bush, unless you call his Iraq foray a success, is the dog that is being waved by a tail called Saddam. Gees, I wonder if it will get him elected... Hear's hoping not.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (642463)	10/11/2004 8:30:44 AM
From: E. T.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden - good... World Trade Centers fall under Bush - bad..." Bush vacations in August, gets special CIA report warning that aircraft may be used in a major terror attack soon in a major U.S. city..... and the Bush vacation continues... dum de dum dum.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (642463)	10/11/2004 8:31:26 AM
From: E. T.	Respond to of 769670

"Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq - good... Bush imposes regime change in Iraq - bad..." Absolutely! Because Bush has made of mess of things over there.