SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (76588)10/11/2004 4:12:43 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793782
 
Do you think they only have one nuc....my guess is there are several out there. And no, don't think Seattle would be the first....you're right....Long Beach and NY would be first. But, unfortunately, in some ways, we are still high tech territory, Gates with Bio Tech and M'Soft, Paul Allen's world, McCaw's world, Boeing manufacturing, gateway to Canada and Alaska, as well as the Far East, westerly winds going east.... etc....

But that aside....who is only thinking nuclear...? There are MANY other kinds of MWD that would cause a good deal of long lasting damage. And probably easier to get into the country.

If we think people are having a fit about flu vacs not being available....just wait. There could be other things to be having fits about....that is, if some of us live through the bio weapons....



To: Ilaine who wrote (76588)10/11/2004 4:50:57 PM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793782
 
If you were a terrorist and only had one nuclear weapon, would you use it to mess up the Port of Seattle? Get serious, now.

There are some potential very lucrative military targets from just N of Seattle to Portland.