Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abstract who wrote (76741)	10/11/2004 11:09:25 PM
From: aladin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793822

ab, I am opposed to the death penalty because too many mistakes happen and the process is irreversible Abortion and euthanasia are also irreversible. A consistent moral argument is to be against all of these. To get all high and mighty about one and not the others is pretty inconsistent - both from a logical and moral standpoint. To defend 'E's position would be to invite 3rd trimester last hour abortions - since you couldn't force anyone to gestate one second longer than they feel comfortable with. This carries over to stem cell research. If you buy the argument on embryonic stem cells - then next year I will want human cloning - it can replace organs. It can 'cure' my wife and you 'ethic' police are preventing us from obtaining it. It will happen. John@alinemustgetdrawnsomewhere.com