Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: R2O who wrote (76938)	10/12/2004 4:59:12 PM
From: Captain Jack	Respond to of 793896

HHMmm- Maybe Mr Kerry-Heinz could beg his wife for a few bux since he thinks it needed.

To: R2O who wrote (76938)	10/12/2004 5:11:33 PM
From: Ish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793896

<<The 'ban' is only against Fed funding of embryonic stem cell work.>> And it's only not funded if one of the 11 lines of cells aren't used. Clinton never funded one line. <<For the short term (to help those of us already born) bone marrow is the obvious choice. Going forward, cord stem cells would be first choice since they would be one's own: no rejection problems.>> Yeppers, that's the way it stacks up. There is some people who are having their baby's umbilical stem cells frozen. I don't know how long they keep.