Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (147720)	10/13/2004 9:28:19 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

We neednt have insulted the russians by including odious verification proceedures when their interest regarding these weapons systems are in line with ours. Why would they have fooled us? Mike They're building a nuclear system that the BMD won't protect against. It seems they don't trust the US. i am making the assumption that you are right about the no verify thing in the first place. Is it no verify or veryify too lite for your taste or just another way for you to make an anti-bush statement? There is absolutely no verfication requirement in the treaty. The best "defense" that I could make for it... Is that if you've got half a brain, you can build any number of weapons you want and never techincally violate the terms of the agreement. If you can't violate the agreement, what's to verify? The entire agreement is a complete joke as an arms treaty. jttmab