SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (60139)10/13/2004 12:40:18 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
oh yeah...forgot that!
how bout those mountain top COAL MINES......
watch out DOWNSTREAM
check your MERCURY CONTENT TOO
CC



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (60139)10/13/2004 12:42:35 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
Bodies of babies found in Saddam's 'killing field'
By Joe Murphy, Evening Standard Political Editor
13 October 2004

A mass grave containing the bodies of children, babies and their mothers has been unearthed in Iraq.

Shocked investigators reported finding "thighbones the size of matchsticks" at what they believe is the site of one of Saddam Hussein's atrocities. Among the findings-were the skeletons of unborn babies and toddlers clutching toys.

A baby had been shot in the back of its head and was found still being clutched by its mother, who had been shot in the face. The discovery was reported as Tony Blair came under mounting pressure to apologise to Parliament for the misleading intelligence claiming Saddam had weapons of mass destruction.

It will strengthen the Prime Minister's case that despite the intelligencefailures the war to topple the Iraqi dictator was justified by his record as a mass killer of his own people. Mr Blair is facing MPs for the first time since the Iraq Survey Group report last week admitted there were no illegal chemical and biological weapons in Iraq.

Liberal Democrat leader Charles

Kennedy demanded he make a full Commons statement on the findings but Mr Blair was hoping to escape by merely answering questions at his regular weekly appearance.

The mass grave was being excavated near Hatra, a village in northern Iraq with a large Kurdish population. US-led investigators have located nine trenches so far containing hundreds of bodies, believed to be Kurds killed during the repression of the Eighties. The bodies had been bulldozed into the ground.

Evidence from the graves will be used at the Iraqi Special Tribunal where Saddam will face trial for war crimes. "It is my personal opinion that this is a killing field," said Greg Kehoe, a US official. "Someone used this field on significant occasions over time to take people up there and execute them."

One trench contains only women and children while another contains only men. "The youngest foetus we have was 18 to 20 foetal weeks," said a US investigating anthropologist. "Tiny bones, femurs - thighbones the size of a matchstick."

Some 300,000 people are thought to have been killed during Saddam's regime. Iraq's human rights ministry has reportedly identified 40 possible mass graves across the country.

Meanwhile, Saddam underwent an operation to repair a hernia about 10 days ago and has made a full recovery, Iraqi sources said today.

He has been in US custody since 13 December and appeared in court in July for a preliminary hearing.

thisislondon.com



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (60139)10/13/2004 12:58:54 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
America's Clean Little Secret
FCAP Executive Summary

Inside the Executive Summary:

* Nationwide NAAQS Compliance for Four Serious Pollutants
* Progress Meeting NAAQS for Ozone and Particulates in Spite of New Tougher Standards
* Spotlighting One Industry’s Clean Air Progress
* Paradox One: Healthier Air AND a Healthy Economy
* Paradox Two: Why Doesn’t the Public Know They’re Breathing Cleaner Air?
* Conclusion

The Clean Air Act, now 34 years old, arguably has been the most successful environmental legislation ever passed by Congress. Year after year since its adoption, America’s air quality has become cleaner and healthier. Ironically, the public seems to have only a limited understanding of this steady progress and continues to believe, wrongly, that air pollution problems in the United States are either increasing or at least not abating.

Originally approved in 1970 and periodically amended over the years, the Clean Air Act directed the newly created Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to identify the most serious pollutants and establish national standards based solely on protecting human health. EPA singled out six pollutants that met this criteria — carbon monoxide, lead, ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulates — and after examining epidemiological and other data, set ambitious National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for each.

Because the nation hadn’t yet installed monitors, we’ll never know the true impact our air had on human health in 1970 . . . but based on monitored data collected after significant progress had been made, it’s safe to assume that Americans were then routinely exposed to unhealthy levels of all six pollutants.

Back to the Top

Nationwide NAAQS Compliance for Four Serious Pollutants
Today, America’s air is dramatically cleaner and healthier. The most recent EPA data (collected in 2001-2002) found that:

* Nowhere in the U.S. were unhealthy levels of nitrogen dioxide measured.
* Nowhere in the U.S. were unhealthy levels of sulfur dioxide measured.
* Only 3 of the 3,132 U.S. counties exceeded lead standards (all three have lead smelters).
* Only 3 of the 3,132 U.S. counties exceeded carbon monoxide standards (all were due to localized conditions that are being or have been addressed).

Back to the Top

Progress Meeting NAAQS for Ozone and Particulates in Spite of New Tougher Standards
This study examines the other two criteria pollutants — ozone (smog) and particulates (soot) — in greater depth. While impressive progress has been made in reducing both the number of days these standards are exceeded (“excedances”) and the severity of those exceedances, new, tighter standards were established in 1997. These new NAAQS raised the bar for each pollutant, consequently increasing the number of measured exceedance days.

For many reasons, ozone has been the hardest pollutant to control and, with the new 8-hour NAAQS, will be the hardest to control in the future. But while monitors determined that only 5% of the population breathed air that met the previously set 1-hour NAAQS in 1980, more than 70% do today. And in those “nonattainment areas,” the number of hours of exceedance has dropped by 75-80% for the 1-hour standard (55-60% for the 8-hour standard) since 1980. Stated differently, the average nonattainment area exceeds the 1-hour health standard for 8 of the 8,760 hours in a year (and 58 hours a year for the 8-hour standard). Finally, the severity of exceedances has been reduced by 70-75% for the 1-hour standard (and by 70% for the 8-hour standard) since 1980.

Because good data on PM-10 and PM-2.5 (the two NAAQS for particulates) only became available in 1990 and 1999, respectively, long-term progress in reducing particulates (particularly PM-2.5) is impossible to assess. Nevertheless, in nonattainment areas, 70% and 30-40% fewer Americans today are exposed to unhealthy annual levels of the respective annual and daily NAAQS for PM-10 than were exposed in 1990.

Back to the Top

Spotlighting One Industry’s Clean Air Progress
The study also examines one industry — electricity generation — in detail, tracing that industry’s progress in reducing emissions and analyzing additional measures that will build on that progress. In addition, the study determines where emission levels would be today if that industry had not invested in environmental improvements since 1985 (a time when the nation experienced a 56% growth in electricity demand). Today’s NOx and SO2 emissions are 48% and 55% lower than levels we would have experienced with no action. And future progress will be even brighter, as respective 2015 emissions of NOx and SO2 will be 80% and 88% below the “no action” levels.

Back to the Top

Paradox One: Healthier Air AND a Healthy Economy
Americans are breathing healthier air despite a dramatic rise in the economic and demographic factors that are normally associated with increased pollution. According to the most recent data from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency1, since 1970:

* Nitrogen oxide emissions have declined by 17%,
* Sulfur dioxide emissions have declined by 49%,
* Lead emissions have declined by 98%,
* Carbon monoxide emissions have declined by 41%
* Volatile organic compounds (which are precursors to ozone) have declined by 48%, and
* Particulate emissions from combustion declined by 82%

and yet

1. U.S. population grew by 42%, to 291 million,2
2. Overall energy consumption grew by 43%, to 97.351 trillion btu.3
3. Total U.S. employment grew by 95%, to 138 million.4
4. The number of registered vehicles grew by 111%, to 235 million5
5. Annual Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) grew by 151%, to 2.8 trillion miles,6 and
6. “Real” Gross Domestic Product (GDP) grew by 175%, to $10.381 trillion.7

Back to the Top

Paradox Two: Why Doesn’t the Public Know They’re Breathing Cleaner Air?
This does not imply that the nation has reached the finish line, either in making improvements or in educating the public about the cleaner air they’re breathing. There are still portions of the U.S. that continue to experience NAAQS violations and efforts to bring these areas into compliance will continue. Unfortunately, the demonstrated progress we have made to date is in stark contrast to public perceptions about the air they breathe. In tandem with this study of EPA data, FCAP commissioned a current poll of public opinion. Conducted by Wirthlin Worldwide from August 20-23, 2004, the survey found that only 29% of all American adults believe that air quality in the U.S. has improved and only 28% believe it will improve in the future!

Back to the Top

Conclusion
Policymakers and the public need to recognize the significance of these dual paradoxes, that:

1. A healthy economy, robust growth, and cleaner air aren’t mutually exclusive, and

2. Americans aren’t aware of the demonstrable improvements the nation has made in improving the health of the air we breathe.

The nation should be proud that it has made historic strides in improving its air quality without sacrificing jobs, productivity, and economic development.

A complete copy of this report can be found by clicking here.

1 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
2 U.S. Department of Commerce; Census Bureau
3 U.S. Department of Energy; Energy Information Agency
4 U.S. Department of Labor; Bureau of Labor Statistics
5 U.S. Department of Transportation; Bureau of Transportation Statistics
6 Ibid.
7 U.S. Department of Commerce; Bureau of Economic Analysis