Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : High Tolerance Plasticity -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cnyndwllr who wrote (21865)	10/13/2004 3:48:32 PM
From: kodiak_bull	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23153

Ed, You wrote and I agree with this part of what you wrote: "Yes, the draft possibility is a scare tactic. . . . And it does help the Democratic ticket. That's why they raise it." Are you saying that Harkin KNOWS about the secret plans? If not (clearly not) then he's made it up. Why? To help the Democratic ticket, to foster fear. Unethical? Get real. As for the article, I was just wondering about the technicalities of discharges, etc. I don't have the experience, and thought maybe the reporter was just leaving out the obvious explanation. One thing, though, if Kerry had received a dishonorable discharge, with whatever explanation (Nixon, Colson, etc.), my opinion is voters ought to know and have known, long before this, about this in a person who is running to be commander in chief. Or do you think it might be irrelevant? Kb