SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (60442)10/14/2004 10:38:41 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 89467
 
The Third Debate

By Joel Mowbray
FrontPageMagazine.com | October 14, 2004

Spinning facts and figures is as old as politics itself, but last night, Sen. John Kerry marshaled a mountain of distortions in his indictment of the Bush administration.

Here’s the rundown, reserved for purposes of clarity and brevity to the areas of economy and jobs, health care, and college costs:

Economy and Jobs

- Kerry claimed that during the Bush administration, “1.6 million jobs [were] lost.” In truth, the figure is half that. Only 800,000 net jobs have been lost, and even that figure is widely expected to be revised downward to 600,000. Considering that 9/11 wiped out 1 million jobs right away, and 1.5 million within a year—all coinciding with the inherited recession and the stock market correcting its irrational exuberance—Bush’s record on this count is, in fact, impressive.

- Kerry: “He’s the only president to have incomes of families go down for the last three years.” According to official U.S. Commerce Department figures, per-capita after-tax income is up 6 percent since December 2000—and that’s not even counting the results from the economic growth of 2004.

- Repeating a populist—and untrue—line from his stump speeches, Kerry said, “The jobs the president is creating pay $9,000 less than the jobs that we’re losing.” This sounds like a devastating indictment, and it plays right into the urban legend that disappearing manufacturing jobs are replaced by burger-flippers. According to the nonpartisan FactCheck.org, “Higher-paid occupations, like managers (who can be in any industry) and health professionals, are growing faster.” This claim is largely based on Federal Reserve of Chicago study released last month.

- In perhaps the most flagrant lie of the night, Kerry charged, “Under President Bush, the middle class has seen their tax burden go up and the wealthiest’s tax burden has gone down. Now that’s wrong.” No, Kerry’s wrong. The average family of four earning $40,000 has seen an average reduction of $1,900 (Bush said $1,700 in the debate). Either way, that constitutes a staggering 90 percent reduction from their previous income tax burden. And with the creation of the new 10 percent bracket, every person paying income taxes has received a tax cut. With respect to the other side of the class warfare argument, the top 1 percent now pays a slightly greater share of the overall tax burden than before.

Health care

- Kerry stated flatly, “I have a plan to cover all Americans.” The nonpartisan Lewin Group (which was cited by Bush) calculated that Kerry’s plan would cover only 25.2 million out of 45 million uninsured Americans. As President Bush noted during the debate, the Lewin Group also found that the 10-year price tag would be $1.2 trillion, roughly double the cost estimated by the Kerry camp—which would cover barely half the number of people Kerry claims it would.

- Without batting an eyelash, a dour Kerry pronounced, “Health-care costs for the average American have gone up 64 percent.” It’s not entirely clear what constitutes “health care costs,” but it is clear that health insurance premiums have not risen anywhere near that amount. The worst-case statistic, as calculated by the ultra-liberal Families USA (an organ of Big Labor), health insurance premiums have risen by 36 percent since 2000.

- Pulling a page from the Clinton handbook, Kerry said, “Five million Americans have lost their health insurance in this country.” In fairness to Kerry, this is an accurate statistic—but also incredibly misleading. Because of population growth, the percentage of the population that is uninsured is the same as it was in 1996 (15.6%), and below the level it was in 1998 (16.3%).

- Although not challenged by Bush afterward, Kerry threw out an eye-popping—and grossly exaggerated—figure. The Massachusetts liberal, when discussing the provision in the Medicare prescription drug bill that prohibits Medicare from negotiating with the drug companies, charged that this would cause a “$139 billion windfall profit to the drug companies coming out of your pockets.” The accountants behind the Academy Awards, Price Waterhouse Coopers, found that the impact on drug companies’ profits would be negligible or even negative.

College Costs

- In rattling off a litany of problems allegedly caused by Bush, Kerry claimed, “tuitions have gone up 35 percent.” Actually, they’ve gone down. From a June 28 cover story in USA Today: “What students pay on average for tuition at public universities has fallen by nearly one-third since 1998.”

- In one of the unintentionally funniest moments of the debate, Kerry countered what he himself had said earlier about Pell Grants. First, he said, “They’ve cut the Pell Grants and the Perkins loans to help kids be able to go to college.” After Bush called him on the fib by pointing out that the number of kids getting Pell Grants has gone up, Kerry admitted, “[T]he Pell Grants have gone up in their numbers.” He quickly added that this was “because more people qualify for them because they don’t have money.” Actually, the real reason is that eligibility rules have been loosened in order to allow more kids to qualify.

Whether or not most voters will see the real John Kerry’s come Election Day remains to be seen. May these facts aid them in the process.



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (60442)10/14/2004 10:40:40 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
When the Fallen Refuse to Salute
By Steve Weissman
t r u t h o u t | Perspective

Thursday 14 October 2004

We had never talked, but I knew who she was.

Dear Steve,
My son, Spc Casey Austin Sheehan, died on 04/04/04 in Sadr City. He died saving the lives of fellow soldiers. This is what his soul is crying out to me from heaven:

Mom, my work on earth was finished early. You still have work to do. Bring my buddies home before any other moms have to go through what you are. When your work is finished, we'll be together again.

No matter who wins on Nov 2nd, Casey will still be dead Nov. 3rd. The only way to make sure my son has not died in vain is to end this senseless, illegal war and bring the troops home.

Thank you for your beautiful article. My heart breaks for the 1068 murdered young men and women and for their moms.

Love
Cindy Sheehan

Cindy was responding to my last column "For What Did We Die, Mr. Bush?" Her answer - and her son's - were far more powerful than anything I could ever write. When I tried to read her letter to my wife Anna, my voice kept breaking.



"The Walk of the Fallen," a monument to American GIs who have died in Iraq. Built by Cynthia Moore and Tom Thompson, it is located in Washington State not far from the back gate of Fort Lewis.


Other Moms also wrote, along with veterans of this and earlier wars. One couple - Cynthia Moore and Tom Thompson, former Army intelligence analysts - told me of the monument they built to honor the troops who are dying in Mr. Bush's war. They began it right after Mr. Bush announced "Mission Accomplished," and call it "The Walk of the Fallen." Every week, they read out the names of the newly dead.

How different from the Vietnam era, when it took years before serving GIs, returning veterans like young John Kerry, and the families of those who would never return spoke out so vigorously and in such numbers against the party of war. Sadly, it took even longer before many of us who opposed the war from the start learned to listen to what they were saying.

With Iraq, everything has moved far more quickly. If Mr. Bush rushed the country into war, at least half the country took little more than a year to turn against it.

Why such a rapid response?

Many reasons, from the bungling beyond belief of the Bush Administration to the availability of information and analysis on the Internet. A high school student can learn more about this war in an afternoon than many in my generation knew about Vietnam even after Daniel Ellsberg and Anthony Russo published The Pentagon Papers.

But the present surge in anti-war sentiment is due in large part to military Moms like Cindy Sheehan, veterans like the Cynthia Moore and Tom Thompson, and the victims' families of 9/11. True patriots, they have refused to allow Mr. Bush to use the souls of the fallen to sell his war of choice.

In the historic drama Julius Caesar, Shakespeare has Mark Anthony raise Caesar's bloody toga to inflame the Romans against those who have killed their ruler. In America, our leaders historically wave "the bloody shirt," using and abusing the sacrifice of those they have sent to die - and those who died because Washington failed to take heed.

Guided by the echo in his head that he hears as the Voice of God, Mr. Bush has no earthly limits on how he will use the lives and limbs of others to pursue his blessed crusade. But those he sends to do his bidding - and their families as well - are beginning to see the dirty little secret.

Yes, the terrorists are real and need to be fought. But, as we have documented on this site so many times, much of the Bush Administration's "War on Terror" only plays with our fear to allow American corporations to grab control of Iraqi oil reserves and the production capacity of "terrorist hot spots" from Indonesia and Central Asia to Nigeria, Venezuela, and Colombia.

That is not a good enough reason for young Americans like Casey Sheehan - or anyone else - to give their lives.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A veteran of the Berkeley Free Speech Movement and the New Left monthly Ramparts, Steve Weissman lived for many years in London, working as a magazine writer and television producer. He now lives and works in France, where he writes for t r u t h o u t.

truthout.org