SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (54256)10/14/2004 10:45:29 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Well actually M the Mongols I saw were markedly different... as in as different as a Punjabi or a Somali but I understand your point ... Your tack on disagreeing with Yiwu on the PRC/Taiwan issue is more than little convoluted it seems though... but I realise that is your wrting style :o) The same logic would seem to support China's control of Tibet... just as the USA's control of California, Nevada et al... 100 years later... what does it matter...

Edit or Taiwan's independence if they manage to hold on to it



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (54256)10/15/2004 7:25:40 PM
From: RealMuLan  Respond to of 74559
 
>>The point Yiwu has been making is that China rules what they used to rule.<<

LOL. Thanks for elaborating. Although I only think Taiwan belongs to China, not necessarily Mongolia and Siberia. In the later cases, there might be one day those people will choose to join China themselves. Mongolia has voted twice to merge back to China, although the motion had been defeated.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News