SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Keith Feral who wrote (147959)10/15/2004 1:03:05 AM
From: Dr. Id  Respond to of 281500
 
How is the gay population to react to Edward's assertion that Bush was a sissy boy because he did not play football?

That's a mischaracterization of what Edward's said. He never said that Bush was a sissy boy because he didn't play football. He said that he was a sissyboy because he was a CHEERLEADER! And he was busy jumping up and down waving pom poms while others guys were playing football.

And everyone knows that male cheerleaders ARE sissyboys.

Besides, I don't think the gay population will be voting for Bush. I wouldn't even be surprised if Cheney's LESBIAN daughter voted against him.



To: Keith Feral who wrote (147959)10/17/2004 9:28:54 AM
From: jttmab  Respond to of 281500
 
How is the gay population to react to Edward's assertion that Bush was a sissy boy because he did not play football?

As that's not what Edward's asserted, it's your conclusion that Bush the cheerleader is a sissy boy.

jttmab


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News