SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (77722)10/15/2004 5:46:02 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793928
 
Hugh Hewitt - I have been doing talk radio for 15 years. It is very easy to judge stories as small, medium, large or huge by caller (and now, e-mail) response. John Kerry's abuse of Mary Cheney's privacy, followed by his campaign manager declaring Mary Cheney to be "fair game" --a hunting term-- and Elizabeth Edwards' diagnosis of Lynne Cheney's reaction as one of "shame," is a huge, huge story. Bush had already regained the momentum in the race if all the tracking polls are to be believed, but as word spreads of Kerry's callous opportunism, that momentum will accelerate. Kerry's calculated decision to transparently attempt to divide Bush's evangelical vote by calling attention to Mary Cheney is among the lowest blows struck in American political history, even more appalling because Kerry did it in his own voice, sua sponte. "Fair game" indeed. That's a hunting term. We don't hunt children of our opponents in this country, even adult children.

The press room gasped when Kerry went for the bottom feeders, as Howard Fineman reported. Bloggers immediately noted it. I called it "tacky," far too mild a word in retrospect. Ann Althouse used the term "creepy." Morton Kondracke was as outraged as I have ever seen him. Etc. Etc. Glenn has lots of links. Powerline has a great post as well, with some background.

A few e-mails object that outrage at Kerry's abuse of Mary Cheney implicitly messages that gay and lesbian children are a cause for shame --parroting the Elizabeth Edwards' line. These folks don't get it. Revulsion at a political ruthlessness that would exploit candidates' children regardless of the rationale is driving the disgust.

If a Candidate A's child had juvenile diabetes or was obese, and Candidate B used that child as a springboard to discuss the need for stem cell research or early intervention exercise programs, the disgust would be the same. If Candidate A's child won the World Championship of Poker and Candidate B denounced Candidate A for arguing for limits on Native American gaming, Candidate B would get smacked. If Candidate A's son co-habitated with his girlfriend, and Candidate B brought that up as an example of why partnership benefits should be widespread, the public would rightly hoot at the boorish ass that was Candidate B.

It isn't about Mary Cheney. It is about John Kerry's character, and his ruthlessness. "He is not a good man," Lynne Cheney said three times today. She could have said it thirty times. "Integrity, integrity, integrity?" I wonder what the elder Mrs. Kerry would have said about using an opponent's child as a wedge issue?