Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (206650)	10/15/2004 11:40:23 AM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572719

>Nonsense. NOBODY in this campaign has suggested there might be "shame" involved with homosexuality until Edwards did. NOBODY. It's absolutely implied. That's the only real reason that they'd care. -Z

To: i-node who wrote (206650)	10/15/2004 2:41:50 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572719

They would lead one to believe entirely the opposite -- that she doesn't believe that there's something shameful about it, but the Cheneys do. Nonsense. NOBODY in this campaign has suggested there might be "shame" involved with homosexuality until Edwards did. NOBODY. "She's overreacted to this and treated it as if it's shameful to have this discussion…I think that it indicates a certain degree of shame with respect to her daughter's sexual preferences. Why would the word "shame" even be used here? Well, there is something weird going on.....because you all are making tempest over nada!