SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (206727)10/15/2004 3:20:03 PM
From: brian1501  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1573718
 
What about Bush, is he not a conservative like he says? He's never vetoed a spending bill, unlike the tax and spend liberal Clinton. Bush pushed through the largest new entitlement since Johnson.

I'll agree he spends too much money, but it's clear to me that we have a better chance of spending less under Bush with a Rep congress than under Kerry with potential gridlock, or <gasp>, with a Dem congress.

Both of them say they are going to slash the defecit, why do you trust Kerry with his record the opposite over Bush who inherited a recession, had a huge terrorist attack, and had to pay for several wars?

The first place to cut spending is to get the hell out of Iraq.

This is totally naive. We're there (if you agreed with the reasoning or not), now we need to finish the job.

Then you can start working on the pork. But if you don't have the fiscal discipline to decrease spending, you ought to at least have the moral courage to raise taxes to pay the bills, and not pass them on (with interest) to future generations.

Why on earth would you raise taxes during a recession/recovery? How dumb is that? It's been shown over and again that you make more revenue from the expansion lower taxes bring to the economy than you would from the revenue you gained by raising the taxes (and killing the economy).

Security comes first, then paying off the credit card. In both cases, Bush is the better choice.

Brian



To: Road Walker who wrote (206727)10/15/2004 3:47:04 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573718
 
"He's never vetoed a spending bill"

he did threaten to veto the $87 billion allocation unless it was unfunded. That should count for something...