SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (78068)10/16/2004 6:37:18 AM
From: John Carragher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793903
 
she was not fair game even if she worked on campaign. she was not running for any office. Bush is running for president and debate was with Bush. Kerry had no right to enter into family matters concerning Cheney children. This has back fired and will cost Kerry votes.. It will continue to cost him more votes as democrats keep it alive by supporting such crude and insensitive action. Still waiting for Kerry to say he was out of line , it is the only thing that may save him a vote or two. Wouldn't be surprised if some gays go over to republicans to vote as they can see Kerry is only pandering them.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (78068)10/16/2004 9:20:46 AM
From: Captain Jack  Respond to of 793903
 
Why can't you accept the fact the man is a fool? Excuse me-- the 'person' is a fool- he is not a 'man'. If he is not lieing or making a fool of himself it is because his mouth is shut getting his bowtox injections? He even lies while talking in his sleep to stay in practice.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (78068)10/16/2004 12:42:21 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793903
 
Nah, it wasn't "perfectly reasonable" to keep on about Mary Cheney. I don't think it was an outrage, but it was a gratuitous effort to keep saying, "see, you got a lesbian on your side, so there!" to the Bush team.

And it's being perceived as such:

Message 20649060