Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: exdaytrader76 who wrote (18425)	10/16/2004 9:23:56 PM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 28931

I defended one of the most ignorant series of mindless attacks I have encountered. Your accusation that I made "eight attacks" simply shows that you cannot (or choose not to) differentiate between attacks and truthful responses. 1. "Gullible". That is evidenced by probably several thousand posts here. 2. "Witless". I would never have mentioned his lack of wits were he not demonstrating it in spades while bad-mouthing third parties like an absolute jerk. 3. "Transparent". I cannot expose the transparency of such spite and malice without you calling a simple truth an "attack"? LOL! 4. "Retreater". The word "retreat" was used as a noun synonymous with refuge or hiding place: Truthful...and in no way an "attack". 5. "scoundrel". I related his behaviour to that of a scoundrel. As a measure of the man with regard to the evidence, it was a gentle rebuke and far less than the evidence allowed as a matter of common decency. 6. "blackguard". Yes, he used foul and abusive language. You may be insensitive to the difference between honest dispute and "argument" structured on pretense and the intention to insult and attack character as a proxy for honest and sincere dialogue. Attacking third parties just lowers the bar to the level of a gutter rat. 7. "Impotent arguer". What I said was "impotent in argument". Apparently you do not comprehend the difference? That is fine. You believe that the Egyptians used to be capable of creating life by magic as it says in the bible! Why am I not surprised at how feeble is your understanding and how fraudulent are your arguments?! LOL! 8. "flaccid of character". So. Do you have an argument to convince the thread that his character has any bone in it? Then why not argue points instead of emulating the witless and ignominious "character" of your buddy. Any moron can read his last several posts and see that he was attacking third parties and spewing forth a snake's venom in the most repulsive and imbecilic manner. You underestimate the people here if you think for one minute that you can defend his belligerence successfully with an equal pretense and misrepresentation...without exposing the truth of your own character and the sham of your humanity and maturity. Someday you will learn that the cards read. And you, my little Muffin, should just fold your cards before we see the rest of the stuff that makes your face move and your tongue speak! So far...Not too impressive! LOL!!