Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (646340)	10/17/2004 6:35:34 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 769670

It was a ballpoint pen, both Bush and kerry did the same thing, pull out a ballpoint pen, but why so much ado about nothing? GZ

To: E who wrote (646340)	10/17/2004 1:01:00 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

to be honest I think it is a pretty big leap to show this pic: salon.com and by question imply and implicate that Bush wears devices at even casual encounters with the press [btw, to me it looks like his shoulder blade] the white house said the debate back photo was 'rumples, creases, wrinkles' in the suit - that didn't 'suit' you [or the democrats it seems], calling it a leap, saying 'All I know is the WH can't tell me there was nothing under his tee shirt or under his suit' - hence nothing they say will appease you unless they say it IS something under his suit, t-shirt so it is taken further and further further with you by saying you want to know if he is a cheater, he is cheating, when he debates, when he meets up with the press on his ranch - the hard evidence for this is approximately zero - speculation and innuendo 90+ you've said Kerry is your candidate, so I think you're biased you brought up a photos on the third debate implying Bush's back looks 'questionable in that one too' - IF you did use you a device and it was caught in a photograph during the first and second debate, you sure as hell would NOT risk doing it again - that's just common sense and it puts a huge hole in your theory it isn't a false accusation that Kerry didn't follow the debate rules - John Kerry for a fact brought prohibited material into the Thursday's Presidential Debate, hence by your standards he cheated [I don't think so] of course this then brings up the cheating while they both were in service, which has also been brought into the campaigns to me, that would carry more weight than what they did or didn't bring to the debates but that's me and as you said, everyone is different as I said in my first post, much hullabaloo over very little now off to watch my Pack lose again edit - my entire post was underlined in preview/edit, what's that about?