SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy who wrote (207114)10/17/2004 3:13:49 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574848
 
The pitch for war against Iraq was about WMDs, which the adminstration were certain existed, and don't don't. That was either a lie, or a cock up so large that the head guy should be removed from office.

Personally, I felt that Saddam should have been forcibly removed back in '98. So, the WMD issue just doesn't matter to me.

The situation in Iraq over the last 6-9 months seems like a disaster.

It could have gone better -- but it doesn't seem to me like a disaster. Progress has been slow but steady, and the handover went off on schedule and I believe the elections will, too.

As for Abu Graib, the buck stops where? Bush is the top dog, so the responsibility for all military action leads back to him.

A ridiculous assertion. That's like blaming Nixon for the actions of Calley.



To: Elroy who wrote (207114)10/17/2004 10:06:51 AM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1574848
 
As for Abu Graib, the buck stops where? Bush is the top dog, so the responsibility for all military action leads back to him.

Read Sy Hersh's book...it'll help with your answer to his question. They are crucifying a few stupid soldiers, after sending them to a war they cooked up, and after creating the semi lawless environment in which they could do what they did.

nytimes.com

Al