SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: russwinter who wrote (13574)10/17/2004 9:45:09 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 116555
 
When was the last time you met a 12-year-old who told you he or she wanted to grow up to be an engineer? When Bill Gates goes to China, students hang from the rafters and scalp tickets to hear him speak. In China, Bill Gates is Britney Spears. In America, Britney Spears is Britney Spears. We need a Bill Cosby-like president to tell all parents the truth: throw out your kid's idiotic video game, shut off the TV and get Johnny and Suzy to work, because there is a storm coming their way.
.........................................
This is why I believed so strongly in trying to partner with the people of Iraq to establish some sort of decent government there that might serve as a beachhead for more progressive governance in the Arab world. I have not given up hope for this, but it may turn out that we made too many mistakes and that Iraqis are too divided for such a project to succeed. If so, the next president is going to need plan B - some combination of oil conservation that reduces our exposure to this region, a new military strategy and a renewed focus on promoting better government there through diplomatic and economic means. The Arab world is not even close to educating its baby boomers with the skills needed to succeed in the 21st century. Left untended, this trend is a prescription for humiliation and suicide terrorism.

I realize that elections are no time to expect honesty from politicians. But we're in this hole because the political season used to stop on Election Day. Now it's a permanent campaign. That is simply not a luxury our next president will have. The boomers are coming - from three directions - and we will not be able to deal with them without a president with a real penchant for gaffes of honesty.

nytimes.com



To: russwinter who wrote (13574)10/17/2004 1:41:07 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
But let me ask you a hypothetical about the impact of a future housing bust, and/or GSE hairball.

Why do you think that would necessarily be deflationary, given the easy money cure that you continually see them (CBs) proposing. In fact wouldn't falling asset (home) prices lead to systemic failure of the GSE’s (which may already be failing), leading to a large scale and aggressive bailout via monetization of trillions of $US denominated debt? Worse, this would likely be accompanied by a severe revulsion of $US assets. Therefore, any efforts to intervene by Central Banks would be…that’s right, inflationary for all parties. A deflationary outcome would only occur, if they threw in the towel, did little new monetizing and money printing, and put up a strong goal line defense to defend the integrity of the USD. But at this late stage, even that wouldn't especially be deflationary in my book.


How can a housing bust be anything but deflationary?
Will there be lots more people out of work when there is a housing bust?
Will the value of homes decline in a housing bust?
If the answer to those question is yes, then to believe in credit expansion one has to believe in more credt being extended as people and companies are heading towards bankruptcy while the asset base supporting those loans is declining.
IMO that is a simple concept as well as THE stumbling point of inflationist theory.

Just what lenders are going to keep lending to bankrupt people in these conditions? This just is not the Weimar republic where germany was printing money to pay off debtors. It just is not. The conditions are quite different. Here are the conditions that led to our crack up boom: We had a reckless expansion of credit driven by the GSEs, tax cuts, business tax credits, lowered interest rates, and round after round of cash out refis, all at the same time.

Take a look now: Rates going up, tax credits are expiring in december, oil hikes are acting like a tax, wages are stagnant, jobs are stagnant at best, on a job loss vs gob gain basis wages are falling, an effort to rein in GSEs is starting, inventories are rising, cash out refis are going kaput, and leading economic indicators are headed south. Read that last sentence again and tell me exactly what parts are wrong and what parts are inflationary.

People out of work are going to turn to hard assets like copper? Sorry I do not buy it. The price of oil will be the price of oil and rising oil prices in the face of falling demand for goods and services that will happen in a housing bust is without a doubt the worst of all possibilities and enormously deflationary.

Now, if the US economy sinks please tell me what happens to the world economy. Is China, Japan, and Europe going to keep on producing cars, and furniture and appliance in the face of a falloff in demand in the US? If so please tell me who are they going to sell those goods to. IMO the crack-up boom is not about to happen it is about OVER! It already heppened. In order to keep it going CBs are likely to attempt to support the US$. Will it work? Probably not. But it is irrelevant. With no demand in their countries and no one to sell goods to, we are in for a serious rise in unemployment IMO, not just the US but worldwide. That can only add to the deflationary pressures that are building.

Rising inventories, lower wages, falling demand, higher oil, higher medical costs, rising unemployment, falling stock market, falling home prices.... Russ everyone one of those this is deflationary in my book.

What is amazing to me is that no one sees it.
No one.
Everyone thinks this boom can go on forever.
That home prices will keep rising, that the demand for credit
is unlimited, that the amount lenders are willing to lend is
unlimited, that we can defeat K-Winter even though Japan proved it can only be slowed not stopped.

Possibly the best thing in my favor is that no one sees it.
It is all right here in this simple idea:
Take a look now: Rates going up, tax credits are expiring in december, oil hikes are acting like a tax, wages are stagnant, jobs are stagnant at best, on a job loss vs gob gain basis wages are falling, an effort to rein in GSEs is starting, inventories are rising, home refis are kaput, and leading economic indicators are headed south. Read that last sentence again and tell me exactly what parts are wrong and what parts are inflationary.

Let me add one more thought.
No one will care if there is a collapse in the first year of a presidents term. Very few see the recession that is steamrolling our way and of the few that do, even fewer understand it will be a deflationary bust that has it roots in reckless economic stimulus that has simply exhausted itself by failure to create jobs, and failure to create demand outside of the US.

Mish





To: russwinter who wrote (13574)10/17/2004 1:48:21 PM
From: mishedlo  Respond to of 116555
 
General Motors and Ford Won't Survive as Bankers: David Pauly

Oct. 15 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co., known for a century as manufacturers of cars and trucks, today make their living as money lenders.

There was continuing evidence of that yesterday when General Motors reported a third-quarter profit of $440 million, or 78 cents a share -- all from its financing business, General Motors Acceptance Corp. GMAC's earnings of $656 million covered the parent's losses from making vehicles.

For seven consecutive quarters now, General Motors has made more from lending than manufacturing. Ford has become dependent on its credit business too. The company, which reports third- quarter results Tuesday, got $897 million of its second-quarter profit of $1.17 billion from financing car purchases.

Does it make any difference whether the companies make their profit from making vehicles or lending on them? A profit is a profit after all. This is how it works: In the first half of 2004, Ford Motor Credit Co.'s business was subsidized by Ford auto to the tune of $1.67 billion in what Ford Credit calls ``interest supplements and other support costs.'' The finance unit's profit for the period was $1.59 billion.

Laggards

Still, the answer to the question is yes. The inability to make cars and trucks profitably is a refection of the inability of General Motors and Ford to compete with Japanese rivals Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda Motor Co. While U.S. consumers have been on a spending spree the past three years, GM and Ford could only sell cars and trucks by offering huge incentives, which reached a peak last month when GM offered buyers six-year interest-free loans.

Toyota and Honda have been forced into incentives too, but at numbers per vehicle far less than what the U.S. companies pay, according to CNW Marketing Research in Bandon, Oregon.

General Motors and Ford are losing money on their European manufacturing too. GM said yesterday it would cut its European payroll of about 63,000 workers by 19 percent. General Motors counts heavily on the growing China market but even here, third- quarter profit dropped to $80 million from $142 million in the same quarter last year.

Standard & Poor's yesterday lowered General Motors's credit ratings to just above junk because it's worried about the profitability of the company's auto business.

Crumbling Support

In the months ahead, the financing business may offer the American companies less help. GMAC said its third-quarter profit from vehicle lending actually fell to $259 million from $320 million in the same 2003 period because its net interest margin was lower. GMAC offset that in large part with rising profits from its expanding mortgage business.

Ford Credit says its profit next year will decline because it has decided to lend primarily to buyers of vehicles made by Ford units. Weakened demand for vehicles and an end to the housing boom could cut into GM and Ford financing profits significantly.

The U.S. auto companies also have become something akin to welfare organizations. Moody's Investors Service, which may also lower General Motors' credit ratings, says the company's health- care costs are about $5 billion a year, and rising.

Last year, GM sold $13.5 billion in debt to fund its pension plans, almost doubling its long-term debt to $29.1 billion. Ford planned to put $1.5 billion into its retirement funds in the third quarter.

If General Motors and Ford are ever to live up to their past, they must figure out how to sell cars and trucks at a profit. They can't survive in their current state.

quote.bloomberg.com