SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alan Smithee who wrote (78375)10/17/2004 12:50:19 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof  Respond to of 793838
 
Like I said, Alan... "Make of that whatever you will...."

I stated no opinion....



To: Alan Smithee who wrote (78375)10/17/2004 1:21:12 PM
From: Sig  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
Here is some more about the old TANG records...

First, the AP lawsuit was not against Mr bush, but against the Pentagon and the Air Force.
And it was witch hunt because TANG was supposed to keep individual records for only 2 years, which means there should not have been any to find.
But as a result of the search, TANG found the following:

>>Note the following: A Texas National Guard spokesman, Lt. Col. John Stanford, defended the continuing discoveries, saying Guard officials did not find all of Mr. Bush's records because they were disorganized and in poor condition, in boxes filled with dirt and dead bugs.>>

Sig





To: Alan Smithee who wrote (78375)10/17/2004 1:42:16 PM
From: Captain Jack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793838
 
Take 2 min to check this site and you'll be amazed
powmiafamiliesagainstjohnkerry.com