SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (24598)10/17/2004 3:45:54 PM
From: XBritRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
There are a few other countries with policies of wealth redistribution which are far more aggressive than practiced in the USA. Actually, every other advanced country. Those countries are not noticeably collapsing.

My view is that unfettered, feral free-market capitalism, as practiced say in Victorian London or in the fantasies of the US right, eventually leads to gigantic inequality of wealth and huge suffering at the lower ends of the scale. Such inequality and suffering ultimately destroys societies.. see "Revolution, French" as a random example.

So, on both humane grounds and pure hard-ass political stability ones, I feel the US system is now slightly past the prudent limits of unleashing capitalism. Bush's tax cuts for corporations and the rich have been a strong push in the wrong (to me) direction, and I'll be very happy to see Kerry undoing them come January.

Proud Margaret Thatcher supporter in 1979, proud Kerry supporter in 2004. Socialist extremism is bad, Capitalist extremism is bad.



To: GraceZ who wrote (24598)10/17/2004 4:09:44 PM
From: jrhanaRespond to of 306849
 
<the war on wealth that ultimately makes everyone poorer, especially the poor.>

Amazing how that is ignored deliberately to make political hay. Of course raising taxes hurts the poor most. It also hurts the hardworking productive professional.

The billionaires who inherited or (in Kerry's case) married their way into vast wealth can pay their tax lawyers to take advantage of loopholes so they are not at all affected.

Hypocrisy, as usual, rules.



To: GraceZ who wrote (24598)10/17/2004 6:58:04 PM
From: MrGreenJeansRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
G,

It is not which President does or does not implement tax cuts most of which are a very small in proportion to the GDP anyway. It is what the Federal Reserve does increasing or decreasing the money supply that matters most in the economy. Imo, Federal Reserve policy is what sets the economic tone.